DOW-UAP-PR054, "SPHERICAL UAP ERRATIC MOVEMENT [CALLSIGN] (MISSION) 2022"

[Fritzkquzerk]

So, here's a video from the 2nd release of UAP videos from the PURSUE page.

https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDat...al-UAP-Erratic-movement-CALLSIGN-Mission-2022

It wasn't addressed already but I wanted to do it not because I think this is necessarily anomalous, but just because I can't genuinely think of what I'm looking at.
I was curious about your possible ideas about what this object could be, if it's an object at all.

 

[JMartJr]

One thing I think we are looking at is a boatload of parallax! Note that we seem to have a case where somebody pointed a camera at a screen and tried to keep the "object" in frame while zoomed in on it ( note the onscreen graphic "targeting indicator*" and other on-screen graphics moving in and out of frame), rather than the original video or even just somebody pointing a camera at and taking video of the entire screen and holding the camera still -- if so we have two sources of camera movement to contend with!


* There is probably an actual official term for that, anybody feel free to supply it! I mean this bit:

 

[Fritzkquzerk]

The video appears to be zoomed in quite a lot, but judging by the motion blur of the object, I suspect we're not seeing additional camera movements (for the "camera filming a screen" hypothesis).
Parallax could be responsible for some movements, but we're not seeing any screen data that could help.

 

[Ravi]

The video appears to be zoomed in quite a lot, but judging by the motion blur of the object, I suspect we're not seeing additional camera movements (for the "camera filming a screen" hypothesis).
Parallax could be responsible for some movements, but we're not seeing any screen data that could help.

Motion blur can of course also happen when the camera filming it, is moving fast with respect to the "area of high contrast". In my view this video is (as almost as per normal) just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification. Like, LIZ etc.

 

[Fritzkquzerk]

Motion blur can of course also happen when the camera filming it, is moving fast with respect to the "area of high contrast". In my view this video is (as almost as per normal) just not giving enough information to make conclusive identification. Like, LIZ etc.

Sure, that's possible, but it's also true that to get those movements, you'd either have to film a screen really badly, or do it on purpose by moving the camera around to fake them.
I don't believe that is what's happening, but there's no way I can prove that.

 

[chudley_wetlegs]

Someone's clearly motion tracked the object and zoomed in

Could have been done in After Effects and this is the resulting video, not filmed by a phone.

The zoom pretty much removes the context of the movement, there's nothing to center on to see it's true movement.

 

[Fritzkquzerk]

Someone's clearly motion tracked the object and zoomed in

Could have been done in After Effects and this is the resulting video, not filmed by a phone.

The zoom pretty much removes the context of the movement, there's nothing to center on to see it's true movement.

I wonder why it happened.
I get the whole redaction on screen data, but it's present in some videos and absent in others.
So go figure.

 

[flarkey]

* There is probably an actual official term for that, anybody feel free to supply it! I mean this bit:
View attachment 92000

Its usually called a reticule...

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/reticule

a network of fine lines, dots, cross hairs, or wires in the focal plane of the eyepiece of an optical instrument