Haven't?
Details here:It was also wrong in William Thomas' book because he did the math wrong to convert from F to C. That is pretty obscure now, though.
So. Much. Bunk.
If the chemtrail mania spreads more and more because of this, I feel like there would be significant push back from actual scientists to debunk the myths.HOW (??) to counter the bunk? Facts and science don't seem to have any effect......
If the chemtrail mania spreads more and more because of this, I feel like there would be significant push back from actual scientists to debunk the myths.
...but the large majority of people in the real world don't give any credence to the chemtrail theory.
Most people never heard of it, and it will probably stay in the fringe unless someone commits a serious act of violence. Most likely against a plane.
I certainly hope this happens. It's about time!
but I wonder what the response will be when they don't find anything suspicious.
Three chemtrail believers addressed the board.
No dispute at all. It was a very short meeting.And? What about the balance?
Also, how were these "believers" and their comments disputed? (or, rebutted?).
No dispute at all. It was a very short meeting.
that was the air pollution board, like 12 minutes only. sounds like a really really LONG session of letting everyone in the audience speak is a separate meeting.I did NOT see the live feed.
What does this mean? Was the nonsense of "chem"trails disputed/rebutted, or not??
Maybe they were just trying too hard to not seem condescending or patronizing them.Some of the supervisors (David Kehoe, Bill Schappell) seemed to be sympathetic to the chemtrail activists. Maybe they found their arguments somewhat convincing.
t sounds like it was just a 'notice of concern', not a debate.
Overview of the meeting here:
http://www.redding.com/news/local-news/live-tweets-shasta-county-supervisors-discuss-chemtrails
The video of the Air Pollution Control Board meeting is already up:
http://www.avcaptureall.com/Sessions.aspx#session.237abe84-b052-42fe-bc9c-326b8d88ec57
Four chemtrail believers addressed the board.
I think it's great. if they can convince the tax payers to pay for some testing and a commission of professionals to go over Dane's evidence (which I doubt will happen it would put a big dent in the chemtrail fantasy and alleviate some fear for a lot of people. including pilots and passengers who have to worry about lasers.The fact that David Kehoe lauded Dane Wigington and encouraged him to continue is troubling.
So I believe the council unanimously decided that they needed to gather more information, which is fair if they aren't familiar with the issue, but I wonder what the response will be when they don't find anything suspicious.
What gets me is the people who claim being in ill health soon after seeing trails in the sky.
Youtube version (this is just the 12 minutes of the Air Pollution Board), not the much longer meeting later where Dane Wigington spoke.
Could someone see excessive wear on jet engine "impellers"
What the HECK is a "jet engine impeller"??????
I mean....do these people think that a modern High Bypass Turbofan engine is just a "willy--nilly" thing??
Do ANY of these people understand the sort of engine monitoring programs that ALL major airlines have in place?? These programs are designed to obtain SCHEDULED monitoring info for these engines....for SAFETY and RELIABILITY!
Back in my day, on the Boeing 727....I had to WRITE into a log book, at least ONCE on any flight longer than one hour....the engine parameters at cruise.
Later, it was encoded into the ACARS....same thing with the DC-10 that I flew. (We typed it into the ACARS....line-by-line....hard to describe, here. But, you just DID it!!!)
NOW.....these engine parameters are taken as a "Snap-shot" by the automation, and recorded....ALL as part of an airline's engine monitoring program, and part of the on-going maintenance procedures....ALL to comply with (in the United States) FAA requirements. Other jurisdictions are similar, Internationally.
What the HECK is a "jet engine impeller"??????
I mean....do these people think that a modern High Bypass Turbofan engine is just a "willy--nilly" thing??
Impellers in gas turbine (turboprop) engines[edit]
Some turboprop engines use an impeller instead of an axial compressor. For example the Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100 uses a two-stage compressor with a low power impeller discharging air pressure on the high power impeller which compresses the air again into the combustion chamber. The fuel is mixed in at over 200 psi (1,400 kPa) and the mixture burns in the combustion chamber. The reason for using an impeller instead of an axial compressor is that the engine's length can be reduced.
And if there's something in the fuel, it's only going to affect the turbine blades, even deeper in the engine.
Some of the supervisors (David Kehoe, Bill Schappell) seemed to be sympathetic to the chemtrail activists. Maybe they found their arguments somewhat convincing.
I just sent a letter to David Kehoe, Leonard Moty, Pam Giacomini, Bill Schappell, Les Baugh! Hope to hear back from all or atleast one of them. (Our district supervisors of Shasta County)