Latest activity
-
Ann K reacted to purpleivan's post in the thread French National Assembly to host UAP seminar with true believers with
Like.
Regarding what you said about the "amplitude" of what someone sees (I take that you mean the apparent size of the object), I would expect that most people seeing something very large, so, less likely to be a misinterpretation of something... -
Ann K reacted to Mauro's post in the thread French National Assembly to host UAP seminar with true believers with Like.
So you discount the possibility that we do not have authentic good pictures of truly anomalous objects because no truly anomalous objects exist?
-
Variations on the theme ... -
Ann K reacted to John J.'s post in the thread French National Assembly to host UAP seminar with true believers with
Agree.
I don't see how that analogy works. If someone has photos/ video of (e/g.) a UFO, and doesn't share it, that material can't inform the opinion of others. It is not evidence for us. It is only evidence in the narrow sense that it is a record for... -
2.5 million data points reduced to 187 data points, some of which show absurd jumps. That seems to show that even radar-visual cases cannot alsways be relied upon to give confirming data. -
Ann K reacted to purpleivan's post in the thread French National Assembly to host UAP seminar with true believers with Like.
There have been some comments in this thread that have suggested that for various reasons, such as fear of ridicule, or of missing something happening when attempting to taking a photo/video, may be the reason for clearer recordings of anomalous...
-
-
JMartJr replied to the thread French National Assembly to host UAP seminar with true believers.Yes, in any individual case. The weakness in the "you can't expect good pictures because people are surprised and need a moment to recover, think of their camera and pull it out" argument is that it has to work EVERY TIME. A similar argument... -
Ann K reacted to Gary C's post in the thread Avi Loeb announced to lead new "UAP Science Advisory Council" for White House with Agree.
I'd say that's largely correct as those "centuries of hindsight" included a lot of what we now take for granted as science and technology. Our current understanding of the laws of nature and the development of human biology and culture have...
-
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread Claims of Advanced Tech Recovered from UFOs.Yes but, what about an antigravity steel dingus? -
Fritzkquzerk reacted to JMartJr's post in the thread Avi Loeb announced to lead new "UAP Science Advisory Council" for White House with Like.
Calls to mind one of Ronald Reagan's favorite jokes, here abbreviated as much as I can without losing the point... One must admire the optimism of the UFO believers, I guess... however unfounded the underlying assumption.
-
JMartJr replied to the thread Claims of Advanced Tech Recovered from UFOs.Yep. Essentially, the claim seems to be "Well, THIS would not work, but we had this other thing that would work, trust me bros, but to hide it we patented non-functioning nonsense." It would seem simpler just to not patent anything. If I were...
-
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread Claims of Advanced Tech Recovered from UFOs.Come on the description is so clear! You just need one or two neutron stars to use, and then the craft will fly. Easy as that!
-
Gary C reacted to JMartJr's post in the thread Avi Loeb announced to lead new "UAP Science Advisory Council" for White House with
Funny.
Calls to mind one of Ronald Reagan's favorite jokes, here abbreviated as much as I can without losing the point... One must admire the optimism of the UFO believers, I guess... however unfounded the underlying assumption. -
@FatPhil So, is he claiming it doesn't satisfy #2: I'm lost here. Does that "clear description" need to contain clear descriptions of all precursors and/or equipment needed to make it work? Can the patent be properly issued if it references...
