Whilst I agree with you on this, it is our biased opinion. Many ufo-fans don't accept the multitude of prosaic explanations that have been presented. For every tweet that Mick puts out showing that something is starlink / ISS/ balloons / planes...
Well said!
There remains a body of UFO believers who do not (or refuse to) understand the evidence even when it is presented to them. Their fallback is either complete denial or "whataboutism", where other unrelated sightings are dragged out...
Well said!
There remains a body of UFO believers who do not (or refuse to) understand the evidence even when it is presented to them. Their fallback is either complete denial or "whataboutism", where other unrelated sightings are dragged out...
Then I'll dump this here:
Being a patent lawyer, I had to dig a little deeper because there is a record behind every patent.
As you some of you already know, the patent office does not freely give patents for impossible devices. No perpetual...
"Brocken Specters are known to exist" is different to "At the time and location you took that photo (or that you reported), the image in the fog was at the antisolar point, and the known optical effect of a Brocken Specter in that position would...
Well said!
There remains a body of UFO believers who do not (or refuse to) understand the evidence even when it is presented to them. Their fallback is either complete denial or "whataboutism", where other unrelated sightings are dragged out...
@JMartJr, You use the term "evidence" uncritically here, but perhaps there should be a category for "insufficient evidence for study", i.e. stuff in the LIZ. If things are going to be studied in the future with, possibly, a few researchers and a...
I think the color of meteorites burning up in earth's atmosphere would vary depending on the elemental composition of the particular meteorite. Copper gives an intense green, Barium a lighter green, and many less common materials may also do so.
@Gaspa well the most robust empirical result of ~80 years of UFO research is that under similar observing conditions, individual humans have a high propensity to make the same errors of observation, interpretation, and attribution that humans...
As much a fan of recognizing our biases and blind spots as I am. I really have to ask.
Is it really biased if it tracks with reality?
How many times has this story played out?
Am I being biased by siding with the skeptic, here?
Not saying...