But is he really? He's always struck me as just a person who'd made his mind up, but then who flipped to making his mind up in a different way.
Shermer thinks that "aliens are sky gods for skeptics" - does he even know what a skeptic is?
03:50...
There are plenty of paranormal cases which could have been caused by brocken spectre, Bigfoot sightings of fleetingly captured large moving figures for example. Being able to simulate them as part of an investigation is only a plus.
But is he really? He's always struck me as just a person who'd made his mind up, but then who flipped to making his mind up in a different way.
Shermer thinks that "aliens are sky gods for skeptics" - does he even know what a skeptic is?
03:50...
What's the bunk that needs debunking, and how will this being a feature in sitrec help the debunk better than just a link to a wikipedia page, say?
This is screaming "some features are good, therefore more features are better" to me.
C.f...
Plus it was allowed to expire. If it was patenting something that actually worked, it would be of extraordinary importance and value. But it was allowed to expire for non payment of maintenance fees?
I'd fold some of those together for simplicity. NOTE: My assumption is that the ultimate goal here is to establish if there is a new phenomenon and, if so, to establish what it is.
JM0 -- Things that have been identified, same as their...
Loeb is rather unscientifically binary in his approach: "Either we are dealing with a serious breach of national security or with the biggest scientific discovery in history."
Very much rules out misperception and hucksterism.
There does seem to be a pattern... Garry Nolan and Peter Skafish from Sol Foundation, Matthew Szydagis from UAPx. Loeb's colleagues. Shermer as the token skeptic
Shermer's Skeptic magazine published a press release about his nomination that includes a short bio of each nominee.
Full list of appointees, alphabetized by last name:
Dr. Richard Cloete — Galileo Project postdoctoral fellow trained at the...
This caught my eye, as well. I have nothing against "young" scientists...but if something is being implied
about them being superior for this, seems worth mentioning...