Latest activity

The missing blade was in place on 28/Jan/2024, as its shadow is visible, the rotor appears asymmetric and facing the same way as its neighbours: The repair vessel Zhong Tian 8 presumably left the region on 08/Jan/2024: Which is...

How I found it. First, I manually created a new panorama, rotating each frame so that at least 2-3 turbines were lined up in each frame, and then marked the base with a red dot, and rotated everything so the turbines were mostly vertical. This...

I'm not sure what you are doing, but it sounds like you think the MQ-9 has to travel the same distance as between windmills? If it's parallax, the drone can be going quite slow, depending on where the "pivot" point is.

I consider it a genuine possibility that a source which is prepared to go to great lengths to obscure as much information about an event as possible - everything on-screen/time/location - would be prepared to further obfuscate matters by changing...

We have the handwritten note released by the MoD, and it doesn't mention whether the craft made any noise or not. Then we have Nick Pope. On page 176 of Open Skies, Closed Minds, he claims that the witness heard a "low humming sound." Then...

How I found it. First, I manually created a new panorama, rotating each frame so that at least 2-3 turbines were lined up in each frame, and then marked the base with a red dot, and rotated everything so the turbines were mostly vertical. This...

Found it. 36.405548, 121.250281

Strange. But I checked my simulation again, on the straight part I can match all the turbines 100% at point A and again at point B 19.7 seconds later. The drone has the same height and fly in a straight line and there is 3.4 km between them...

I expect that's toadally correct, but I don't want to kermit myself at this point.

So what's a frog who can use either foot, amphibidextrous?

(from thread Handedness.) If a young deer can use its right foot and its left foot equally well, it's probably bambidextrous.

It sounds very like setting up a “committee to review the committee” type bureaucracy

It sounds very like setting up a “committee to review the committee” type bureaucracy

As far as I know, we're quite sure that it never made it past the proposal stage. Maybe he means that some of the people on AAWSAP were party to the proposal.

Do we really know that? Given that SAPs are supposed to be secret, they wouldn't tell us or reveal the documents. On the other hand, Elizondo is telling us that KB was some sort of program, which I assume would be illegal if it was/is a SAP...