Fred259
New Member
[Admin: thread extracted from https://www.metabunk.org/showthread.php?p=22752#post22752 and title changed]
Yes. Point number 1 needs to be corrected.
Delete the word “Planes” and instead insert Drones. A pilot-less drone is of course still an aircraft, but it was not a Boeing 757 or 767 as widely assumed.
Here the London Telegraph and the BBC report as far back as 23 September 2001 that the so called Muslims hijackers are actually alive and well so forget them.
If the buildings were hit by anything they were pilot-less drones. This doesn’t change anything of course because we still need to establish who are the real terrorists . However the fuel load would need to be recalculated.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor.../Revealed-the-men-with-stolen-identities.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/1559151.stm 23 September 2001
Well, would you agree that we know that:
?
- Planes flew into WTC1 and WTC2, damaging them
- There were big fires that lasted about an hour
- Both towers collapsed in a manner consistent with progressive collapse
- WTC7 was damaged, and fires burned in it for hours
- WTC7 collapsed, with the interior collapse preceding the exterior
Disagree with any of that?
Yes. Point number 1 needs to be corrected.
Delete the word “Planes” and instead insert Drones. A pilot-less drone is of course still an aircraft, but it was not a Boeing 757 or 767 as widely assumed.
Here the London Telegraph and the BBC report as far back as 23 September 2001 that the so called Muslims hijackers are actually alive and well so forget them.
If the buildings were hit by anything they were pilot-less drones. This doesn’t change anything of course because we still need to establish who are the real terrorists . However the fuel load would need to be recalculated.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor.../Revealed-the-men-with-stolen-identities.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/1559151.stm 23 September 2001
Last edited by a moderator: