Mick
In the thread, WTC 7 (Building 7), in the context of describing the collapse of this steel and concrete building, you said, on the numbers of architects and engineers signed up to AE911 that 99.99% of the world's architects and engineers are in support of Nist's report. No matter how you try to qualify it, that is how you presented it. Oxy called it just right and challenged it:
And you replied
So - at 12.10pm on 26 January, you say you know engineers that would point out if there was something wrong with Nist's explanation.
I subsequently I ask if you've asked your engineer pals about the viability of using Verinage on the towers, you say this
So - I pressed you that you'd recently said you have engineer friends in another thread (WTC7, as quoted above), and I even offered to draft a letter in French if you wanted to find out from a professional, and you then say
Right. So - first you have engineer friends who would tell you if Nist's report was wrong. Then you don't have any engineer pals, then you only have regular civil engineering friends.
If you were the narrator of a book (or, indeed, a witness in court), you'd be considered unreliable.
In the thread, WTC 7 (Building 7), in the context of describing the collapse of this steel and concrete building, you said, on the numbers of architects and engineers signed up to AE911 that 99.99% of the world's architects and engineers are in support of Nist's report. No matter how you try to qualify it, that is how you presented it. Oxy called it just right and challenged it:
You stated it was a 'fact' that 99.99% agree with the NIST explanation. That is patently false.
And you replied
No. I said the seem to agree.
I said that because I know engineers, and if they saw something wrong, they would point it out.
So - at 12.10pm on 26 January, you say you know engineers that would point out if there was something wrong with Nist's explanation.
I subsequently I ask if you've asked your engineer pals about the viability of using Verinage on the towers, you say this
I don't have any qualified engineer pals, and all the Verinage experts are French.
So - I pressed you that you'd recently said you have engineer friends in another thread (WTC7, as quoted above), and I even offered to draft a letter in French if you wanted to find out from a professional, and you then say
I don't have any VERINAGE engineer friends, or any demolition engineer friends, or highrise engineer friends, just regular civil engineering.
Right. So - first you have engineer friends who would tell you if Nist's report was wrong. Then you don't have any engineer pals, then you only have regular civil engineering friends.
If you were the narrator of a book (or, indeed, a witness in court), you'd be considered unreliable.