Let's presume 9/11 was an inside job and
Larry Silverstein went along for the ride because of the potential
insurance windfall. So, after hours, unbeknowst to janitors, office cleaning staff and whomever else would have frequented WTC7 between 1:00am to 5:00am, Silverstein and his demolition demons in the CIA, worked for months to drill, wire and prepare the building for it's 9/11 demise.
Only one problem. Since the plan didn't included scheduled planes to hit WTC7, how could Silverstein have been guaranteed that fires sufficient to cover up the CD, would have ensued? If WTC1 and WTC2 had truly
collapsed in their own footprints, and therefore no falling debris was available to cause the WTC7 fires, how could Silverstein have justified the CD?
So even if WTC7 was fully wired and ready for CD, they'd have had no way of executing it's demolition, short of doing a typical CD when the building was never in distress.
Silverstein had to hope and pray that somehow WTC7 caught fire. Does anyone truly believe this "raining day explosives" theory?
So, let me get this straight. if I really care about the 3,000 who died (I'm told that only conspiratorialists care), I should believe that WTC7 had been primed and readied for demolition, as Silverstein and company HOPED for the conflagration of circumstances i.e. an out-of-control fire that would severely weaken the support structure, necessary to carry out this diabolical CD?
It takes far less faith to believe the most obvious conclusion, that WTC7 was brought down by fire.