Mick's comment right before i said that.What is it that makes you say that you don't understand it?
His clarification to you sounds like the only focus is on strategies to "fix" CTers. CTers bad. Debunkers good.
I thought (and you took from, i can tell) the article was saying debunkers need to be aware CTers pathologize us but that we also pathologize them and we shouldnt do that. and as ZW pointed out that is mostly what is happening in the comment part of the thread. everyone pathologizing THEM. CTers bad. Debunkers good.