I've already said that. Go ahead and ban me if that's what you want to do.
ETA: Also, why spend tax money on something that only a small but vocal group of people are calling for? If they want a new investigation they should bankroll it themselves. I don't like the idea of my taxes going towards an endless loop of WTC investigations.
At least as much as the piece of shit Nick Cage movie. I seriously don't know how defenders of the Commission can look themselves in the mirror knowing what a forcibly half-assed job was done... or how the directors of the commission itself can declare it a failure, and people can say with a straight face "Yeah.. well I disagree."What should be the budget of the new investigation?
At least as much as the piece of shit Nick Cage movie. I seriously don't know how defenders of the Commission can look themselves in the mirror knowing what a forcibly half-assed job was done... or how the directors of the commission itself can declare it a failure, and people can say with a straight face "Yeah.. well I disagree."
It's an easy mistake. They both smell the same.It think you are confusing the 9/11 commission report with the WTC7 collapse report.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-09/nios-bpr091713.php
Beyond peer review: NIST and 5 journals find a way to manage errors in research data
Traditional peer review is not enough to ensure data quality amid the recent boom in scientific research findings, according to results of a 10-year collaboration between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and five technical journals.
...
NIST developed a new online tool (NIST ThermoLit) that allows researchers to generate a literature report containing relevant references retrieved from a NIST database. Researchers can combine this capability with an older experiment planning system (NIST ThermoPlan) at both the conceptualization and publication stages of their work. If the submitted paper passes a journal's peer review, NIST generates a report noting any inconsistencies between the new experimental data and critically evaluated data based on past research. Data are extracted from the submitted paper and validated by NIST's expert software system for data evaluation (NIST ThermoData Engine).