Hi Everyone!
I was looking into QEG and find it fascinating, but wanted to find out why it isn't. So here I am! I didn't read all of it, but I get the point. I guess that one is quiet now because not much has happened since 2016. I asked for info from one of their suppliers and they have a price tag of over $3000 for all parts unassembled except the stator which is another $2500 or so; over $6000 total for a non-working, unproven system. I am sure it is accurate, but too much for my blood. I thought that one of the last entries in the QEG 10k fable thread was pretty good and makes my point pretty well. The people aren't promising anything - they warn the person that they have not provided a developed system, etc. and insist that they get competent help and that they are not in the business so proving something to the skeptics costs them time and money. Ok I get it - they are probably wrong, the thing isn't Tesla anyway according to Gerard Morin - though QEG claims it is.
I thought it to be quite interesting that people are severely stuck on what they 'know' - like those who consider the Big Bang Theory to rule out Creationist Theory, while the Creationists say that it proves a Creator; and Einstein's theories are questionable, but Darwin's theories are sacrosanct. I don't say that to start a discussion, just an observation. And worrying that Flat Earth might be taught in schools - unless I missed my classes somehow, I understood that all of these things are theories and should be taught - not pushed as proven. The classical Newtonian 'laws' are theories - so where do we get off 'debunking'? All these things are presented as true because they are the best that we have until someone proves them wrong somehow. Even Newton realized that his laws didn't explain everything, but were good enough for classical physics. Rather than debunk things, let's just disprove them or show why they don't work, but I don't mind calling them debunked as long as you don't mind having your ideas called 'debunked' - kind of depends on whose ox is being gored, doesn't it?
I am looking for more information on Over Unity, but that doesn't appear to have been discussed - is it not considered to be impossible? I don't agree that Over Unity is impossible and am looking at Gerard Morin - what is wrong with his questioning - what he proposes seems very logical. Pulse modulation to drive motors rather than DC - sounds like a winner! No? And if what he shows is true, the implications are enormous. I have some inclination to tinker with it - is it a waste of time? If it is, at least I will solidify what I thought I knew about electric motors. (And it won't be the first time I followed a rabbit trail when I wasn't hunting for rabbits!) By the way, the motor driving a generator which produces an output greater than needed to drive the generator is only using a motive force different than what we normally consider - magnetism.
Is there a thread somewhere or do I need to start one to get some more information?