this is generally a strong indication that you're looking at a camera artifact; if it wasn't, you'd have noticed the lights when you were there and took the picture.a few weeks later I was slipping through my photos
OT perhaps, but why is it dark enough for everyone to turn on their outdoor lights when the sun is still above the horizon?
Another way for @Morgan987 to reassure themselves would be to have a close look at the garden lights - you'll see a pattern of eight LEDs that match the lights in the sky. The images of the lights themselves are too bright for the camera to pick up the individual LEDs, so you just see a single glare, but the reflection is dimmer so you can see the actual structure of the light source.Mick rotated the image 180⁰ and superimposed it, to prove it matches.
I was once in Wick, near the most northern point of the mainland of Scotland, in mid July. There was a noisy rookery near our hotel, and I thought they'd shut up once it got dark.It does look very dark for a sunset in Cornwall in July, there's quite a long twilight at that time of year.
I wasn't sure what to do with the photos but ChatGPT suggested I post them here.
That's the moon you can see on the horizon, the lights are solar lightsOT perhaps, but why is it dark enough for everyone to turn on their outdoor lights when the sun is still above the horizon?
Yes it was the moonIt does look very dark for a sunset in Cornwall in July, there's quite a long twilight at that time of year.
Is it maybe the moon, @Morgan987?
I'm wondering if you took the photos at night, but flicking through them a few weeks later forgot the circumstances and at a glance assumed it was sunset.
I will happily admit I know very little about photography, and I don't know if using a contemporary camera shooting towards the sun might cause the surroundings to look so dark. But the garden lights are on, and I'd guess they'd be hardly visible before sunset (or for a while after) in July.
From timeanddate.com website, https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/@2638853?month=7&year=2025:
Figures are for St Austell, approx. 7 miles/ 11.3 km to the west of Fowey (full moon on the 10th).
View attachment 84929
Edited to add: I think there might be a few stars visible, especially on the right of the picture?
That makes sense, thank you
Thank youAnother way for @Morgan987 to reassure themselves would be to have a close look at the garden lights - you'll see a pattern of eight LEDs that match the lights in the sky. The images of the lights themselves are too bright for the camera to pick up the individual LEDs, so you just see a single glare, but the reflection is dimmer so you can see the actual structure of the light source.
From a quick Google, they are probably something like these solar powered ones?
View attachment 84935
Thank youthis is generally a strong indication that you're looking at a camera artifact; if it wasn't, you'd have noticed the lights when you were there and took the picture.
Lens reflection are usually exactly opposite, across the exact center of the image, i.e. if you connect each LED light with its sky reflection in the opposite corner, the 3 lines meet in the center.
Mick rotated the image 180⁰ and superimposed it, to prove it matches.
Yes, the original poster had replied but the posts were not visible as they had to be approved. I will amend the title.Is there broad agreement that the picture has been explained?
The rings of eight lights, apparently in the sky, are reflections of the lights in the garden. Their positions re. each other, and when the image is rotated, match.
A mistake in remembering the time that the photo was taken leads to error in assessing how objectively bright the scene was at the time (much darker than at sunset) and a misperception of the brightness of the lights that appear to be in the sky (the reflections).
Maybe the thread title should be changed/ added to?
That makes sense, thank you