1) I don't know it isn't Tamerlan's bag throughout the post I say that it must be his/ is consistent with his. However there were about 40 people wearing similar black backpacks in the scene. Secondly the location of Dzhokhar's absolutely matters. If we only have proof of one device going off why is it consistent to suspect the brothers and not a lone wolf? If we only have one exploded backpack why two freakin suspects when it could have easily been a backpack with two bombs and one got taken out. If Dzhokhar's backpack had the same type of bomb in it we should find similar results to his backpack somewhere on the crime scene. Does anyone have any evidence of this?
2) You seem to lacking critical thinking skills to think that, they aren't getting a jury trial and all of the evidence has been released. Do you have any sort of reason to think its possible that they haven't released all the evidence when again and again authorities are telling us they have released everything we need to see? It's freaking proprietorial misconduct to hide a piece of evidence until a case reaches trial! Have you ever been on a jury? Do you have any idea what discovery is?! You have to disclose any piece of evidence you are going to use in a trial before it starts!!!!!!! Do you have any ideas how many laws the cops would be breaking not to release that piece of evidence? (they might be able to hold while the case was active, and in the case that it would risk someone's life to release the information to the public, but can you think of anyway the location of Dzhokar's backpack could count as that?) I think you have seen one too many episodes of law and order, real courts don't work that way. I can not object more strongly to this line of reasoning, you are essentially saying I trust that there will be more evidence at some point. This in no way supports your argument that it must have been the brothers.
3) This is not a made up story this is a massive gap in the official narrative. Please link to any video of either of the brother putting a back pack down if you can find one anywhere I'll stop and admit you are right. It is not a lack of critical thinking skills to say why in a scene with 40 people wearing the same backpack do you know it was him. There is tons of circumstantial evidence that it was the brothers but I have yet to see a single piece of physical evidence.
Adam I am not substituting facts for a narrative I have no narrative I am asking a question. You say you think there is a video of them putting a backpack on the ground, well I think you just invented a massive fact to support the official narrative. And yes the police have released that the same style pressure cooker bomb was used in both explosions, and backpacks are generally made out of the same materials give me any reason to believe one would be vaporized and the other 90% left when the explosions were identical. Trying to silence dissent is sad, if I'm as wrong as you seem to think how about a single link about anything you just said?
1.) Two boms went off that day. I heard them and I saw them. You seem to be denying that two bombs went off. That picture of the backpack is most likely Tamerlan's by visual recognition, however, unlike Truthers, I will come out and say that I have no specialization in photo analysis and I, like everyone else, have only been exposed to probably 20-30% of the actual evidence.
2.) Yes. I've been on a murder trial here in Massachusetts. I know how the court system works. Evidence has to be presented and available access to other lawyers and not the public. You're trying to make it sound like they have to present every piece of evidence they're using to every single schlub on the face of the planet.
3.) Explain WHY there would be a massive gap on purpose? So, the government is smart enough to hatch this plan, yet not smart enough to provide a 100%, watertight story? Smart enough to bomb the Boston Marathon, but the story is weak enough for any idiot with a laptop to crack open? Yeah, that makes sense! They have access to evidence that you and I
are not privy to. They are experts in the field. You and I are not. Funny how you say THEY have "tons of circumstantial evidence" yet you're saying that it probably wasn't him because other people had backpacks at the scene. You know victim Jeff Bauman helped identify the bombers, right? Instead of hiding behind your computer, why not come to Boston and say to his face that he's lying or is wrong?
To be frank the info wars people are way better linked and in most cases better spoken (in internet parlance) than they users on this site.
You do know that Alex Jones believes homosexuals are created by the government through juice boxes and he believes the FDNY is guilty of manslaughter on 9/11, right?
Better spoken? I don't think so.
