Blues63
New Member
This is my first post so I don't know if this the correct procedure. I've looked through many of the threads but I can't seem to find where the following is addressed. If there is a thread, I apologise for wasting time.
Anyway, I often 'debunk' 9/11 canards on various sites, often at an amateur level, but this one surfaced recently and I'm at a loss to explain it sufficiently.
A follower of 9/11 truth believes the following pic is a 'smoking gun' for a controlled demolition:
The individual claims that the areas circled in yellow were left uncut in order to 'prep' and facilitate the execution of the collapse.
The columns were supposedly pre-cut to weaken them for when the explosives were deployed.
Are these areas uncut and fractured. Does anyone know about the provenance of the pic? I once read it was the product of a thermic lance, but I can't confirm that notion.
Anyway, I often 'debunk' 9/11 canards on various sites, often at an amateur level, but this one surfaced recently and I'm at a loss to explain it sufficiently.
A follower of 9/11 truth believes the following pic is a 'smoking gun' for a controlled demolition:
The individual claims that the areas circled in yellow were left uncut in order to 'prep' and facilitate the execution of the collapse.
The columns were supposedly pre-cut to weaken them for when the explosives were deployed.
Are these areas uncut and fractured. Does anyone know about the provenance of the pic? I once read it was the product of a thermic lance, but I can't confirm that notion.