"Tetra Class" UAP "Leaked" (more birds)

Fin

Senior Member.
Skywatcher (or someone) "leaked" some ufo videos a few days ago. A friend who saw them before the links were deactivated roughly described to me what he saw. My first guess was more Tetra Class UAP (more accurately known as "birds"), because Skywatcher seem like they couldn't identify a coke can on a picnic table from 100 yards.

These types of UFO misidentifications have been discussed here before. They're classic LIZ (low information zone) examples, where when we do get better footage of the same thing and manage to zoom in, we can see its obviously birds, primarily from the flapping of wings. Although the flapping is not immeditately apparent in these new Skywatcher vids (hence LIZ) literally everything else about them is entirely consistent with known videos of birds, from the slightly altering formations, to the speed & trajectory. There is actually flapping & wings, but its distorted, much like the stars, meaning that to the untrained eye it looks like it might be "anomalous". Its not.

There's so much wrong with Billy's analysis (I call it BroPixel analysis) its not even funny. Well, it kind of is.


Source: https://x.com/BillyKryzak/status/1949193914583527533




As we can see here below: More "Tetra Class" UAP. Until, that is, we zoom in, overcoming the LIZ, enabling us to see the wings flapping. Nothing about the new skywatcher vids suggests anything different is happening.

"Visual references_ Flock of Birds, night time"

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23lk-GzwwhQ
 

Attachments

  • Visual references_ flock of birds, night time (720p_30fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4
    16.7 MB
Last edited:
I saw this leak on reddit, the thread was removed, some streamable links were posted and I downloaded the file (3 videos 1 csv) but as they were on streamable there's no metadata


Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1m6rb8p/leaked_skywatcher_videos/


I gave it all a brief glance as it seemed like a LARP.

tetra-sortie-001-eo.mp4

tetra-sortie-001-swir.mp4

tetra-sortie-001-mwir.mp4

The radar data file thing

1 video looks like it is from the CUAS platform Skywatcher use, but it could be part of an older video they out out modified by someone else, I've not tried to track it to any of their previous footage though,the others are different aspects and look a little "fake" to me as in the noise looks a little generated rather inherent, but I have given them nothing but a brief glance.

The csv purports to be radar data.

Therse are the headers in the csv

DateTime, Alt (m/agl), VelAbs (m/ps), Range (m), Azimuth, Lat,Lon

The lat and long puts it here

https://maps.app.goo.gl/JW3a5LDetJrbNiXQ7

This is 300km as the crow (or egg/borrowed helicopter) flies from where Skywatcher operate near Mile High Texas

I've attached the files in-case anyone is interested and wants to look at them more.




 

Attachments

Last edited:
the csv shows the azimuth tracking from -85 to -102 (42 degrees) and covers 44 seconds
the compass in the video shows 226 to 144 (82 degrees)
the dial in the video shows 30 backwards (through 360) to 307 degrees (183 degrees) and is 44 seconds

The compass is not synced with the azimuth dial, indicating the dial is possibly ownship centred

When the compass shows due south, the azimuth dial indicates 344 degrees.

This matches with the alignment of the road near the GPS location, this possibly indicates the csv data is related to the video, but the degrees covered seems to vary probably from camera angle not matching radar track motion with target, ownship and relative angles all changing..

Perhaps sitrec can help here? The angle seems to match the road.

1753608158322.png


The rest of the metadata is blurred, a mouse cursor is moved into place in the 1st few seconds, indicating a screen recording

1753608910382.png
 
Last edited:
So I tried to work out some elevation angles but the csv seems to have a flaw?

Range is lower than altitude above ground level, which is not possible, both are given in meters.

Maybe I am missing something, could it be range to the ground track?
 

Attachments

  • 1753619884279.png
    1753619884279.png
    171.9 KB · Views: 59
Last edited:
So I tried to work out some elevation angles but the csv seems to have a flaw?

Range is lower than altitude above ground level, which is not possible, both are given in meters.

Maybe I am missing something, could it be range to the ground track?
Yeah, that's odd, I suspect it's the horizontal range.

I my sitch I'm only considering time, lat, lon, alt (AGL)
 
Back
Top