I'm speechless at this. Completely meaningless drivvle from 1:00, link after random link...
At some point you really can't argue with an assessment like that. However it's still best to avoid discussing mental illness in any context where it might "spill over". Some people believe in chemtrails, Hilder believes in chemtrails, he seems (to most people) to be mentally ill, but then does that mean everyone who believes in chemtrails is mentally ill? Even if you don't think that, common faulty logic is going to lead to some people getting that impression.I'm sorry if this is offensive, and Mick is welcome to remove this if he sees fit, but people like this are mentally ill. I don't understand why we have to be so delicate about it. They are delusional and need treatment.
I thought it was humorous myself. It was like some kind of sci fi comedy. I kept thinking it looks like some old hippie with died hair interviewing one of the ladies from Absolutely Fabulous. Oh, wait, perhaps it WAS the ACTOR name Joanna Lumley playing Deborah Tavares. (Channeling Ed Chiaraini here. )Referring to Hilder in "Targeted to Die":
Comedian? A very specialised schtick, he has there. He is very knowledgeable about all this; encyclopaedic!
Brilliant performance. I loved the Alcatraz link. "Ted Turnrerhead" "globaloni" So funny.
Oh! Another person in sunnys?
And the dog shit again! LOL
"Rocketfella" "Communiass" "Sin Fransisco"
Priceless... a must watch.
I think it's kind of like Ed Chiarini, it's so absurd it isn't worth debunking.I think we can all agree he seems a bit crazy. the question for debunkers though is: what, if anything, should be done about it? Should we point at him and say "look how crazy this guy is", should we take him seriously and attempt to calmly debunk his theories, or should be ignore him?
I feel that the best thing to do is ignore him, unless he actually gets some traction somewhere. If a theory is limited to just a handful of people, there's not a lot to gain from debunking it. And bringing up the mental health issue is tricky, as it might alienate some people who are more marginal.
They used a cell line HEK-292 that is derived from the kidney cells of a single aborted fetus in the 1970s. This was just used in the development of flavor enhancers, and does not not go in the drink. They are not even fetal cells, the fetal cells were used to start the line 40 years ago, and now the cells are something very different from what they started out as. HEK-293 has been used in research ever since, for literally thousands of reasons.http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/30/pro-lifers-drop-pepsi-boycott/
They did use fetus cells for pepsi.
|Thread starter||Related Articles||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Debunked: Corbett Report Targeted by Google/Youtube||Conspiracy Theories||37|
|TFTRH #33 – Anthony Magnabosco: Street Epistemology and Conspiracy Theories||Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast||1|
|New Anthony Hilder video "How to take on the enemy"||Contrails and Chemtrails||1|
|Anthony Hilder's AIRCRAP advertising Aluminum Oxide as a 'Natural Cellular Defense'||Contrails and Chemtrails||47|