Alex Jones knows no limit to his insanity...today on his show he was talking about how Bill Gates and the NWO have genetically engineered mosquitoes to inject people with a special vaccine that makes them sterile. This clip is from last year, but its the same concept.
They are already in production.
It can be remotely controlled an is equipped with a Camera and Microphone. It can land on you and may have the potential to take a DNA sample, or leave RFID tracking nano-technology on (or in) your skin.
As mentioned in the same article from which you pulled the image:
The specific mosquito-like object pictured above is, however, just a conceptual mock-up of a design for a MAV, not a photograph of an actual working device "already in production." And although taking DNA samples or inserting micro-RFID tracking devices under the skin of people are MAV applications that may some day be possible, such possibilities currently appear to be speculative fiction rather than reality.
They are already in production.
It can be remotely controlled an is equipped with a Camera and Microphone. It can land on you and may have the potential to take a DNA sample, or leave RFID tracking nano-technology on (or in) your skin.
FOr what reason would anyone want to spend a ton of money to land a fake mosquito on me and take a DNA sample. Why would anyone want to plant a chip in me?
Alex Jones knows no limit to his insanity...today on his show he was talking about how Bill Gates and the NWO have genetically engineered mosquitoes to inject people with a special vaccine that makes them sterile. This clip is from last year, but its the same concept.
FOr what reason would anyone want to spend a ton of money to land a fake mosquito on me and take a DNA sample. Why would anyone want to plant a chip in me?
Worth noting that the OP is not about robot mosquitos, but about theoretical live mosquitos that have some kind of genetic modification that allegedly sterilizes people.
The story comes from an attempt to combat malaria by releasing mosquitos that have been genetically modified to produce sterile young.
These mosquitoes are created by injecting mosquito eggs in the lab with a killer gene. It produces a protein called tTA, which stops the mosquitoes' cells from turning on other genes which are essential for the bugs to survive.
The resulting GM male mosquitoes are then released into the wild to breed with non-GM females, producing offspring genetically programmed to die well before reproductive age.
The company says that as the number of GM males introduced into an environment increases, the lower the chances the non-GM males have of breeding with non-GM females, until eventually the mosquito population can be effectively eliminated.
Oxitec says it has done tests in Brazil, Malaysia and the Cayman Islands, which show mosquito numbers can be greatly reduced in a few months.
"You first release a few thousand males to see if they will mate, then you move to a control programme. In the Cayman Islands we released 3 million over a few months over 16 hectares. We effectively brought the overall mosquito population down by 80% in three months," Oxitec's CEO Haydn Parry told BBC World Service.
While only GM males are intentionally released, critics point out and Oxitec acknowledges that the release of a small number of GM females cannot be avoided. The males are filtered out for release from the generally bigger females, but some females slip through the net. It is only the female mosquitoes which bite and spread disease.
However, Mr Parry says the small number of GM females that do get released present no danger even if they bite humans. "It's exactly the same as being bitten by a wild one," he says. "The gene, or protein, that prevents the next generation from surviving isn't toxic or allergenic and isn't expressed by the saliva glands" and therefore is not injected into humans when they are bitten.
If a pharmaceutical company had made a drug/protein that could make humans sterile when administered in miniscule quantities they would make a fortune. It could be adapted as a male contraceptive as at the moment the only real reversible way is having something injected into your scrotum or the knife. Even chemical castration, which also inhibits libido, is reversible and needs plenty of drugs. If there was a pill to make me sterile it would have saved me a very uncomfortable and painful time.
I presume it would take a great number of mosquitoes to administer a dose of any real value.
Alex Jones knows no limit to his insanity...today on his show he was talking about how Bill Gates and the NWO have genetically engineered mosquitoes to inject people with a special vaccine that makes them sterile. This clip is from last year, but its the same concept.
It's factual that Bill Gates has pondered GMO mosquitos that vaccinate people when bit, and even conducted some experiments in that direction. I've never heard of this 'robo-mosquito' stuff. Seems like another attempt to sensationalize something real.
It's factual that Bill Gates has pondered GMO mosquitos that vaccinate people when bit, and even conducted some experiments in that direction. I've never heard of this 'robo-mosquito' stuff. Seems like another attempt to sensationalize something real.
Originally Posted by Grieves It's factual that Bill Gates has pondered GMO mosquitos that vaccinate people when bit, and even conducted some experiments in that direction. I've never heard of this 'robo-mosquito' stuff. Seems like another attempt to sensationalize something real.
1) GM Sterilized mosquitoes used to control the population of mosquitos (real) 2) Robot mosquitos used for surveillance (not yet real, but an inevitable product of improving technology. Battery size being the biggest problem.) 3) Delivering vaccines to people via mosquitos. (real research, unlike to be deployed http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...toes-into.html) 4) Sterilizing mosquitos by vaccinating people (A real proposal http://www.tgdaily.com/general-scien...mosquito-bites)
Alex Jones conflates #1, #3 & #4 in the original story, Taz further conflated these with #2 (the robots).
GM of microbes, small animals and plants has positive outcomes. The deadly E. Coli is a popular choice in genetic modification and numerous other scientific studies because of it's prolific ability to multiply and thereby replicate within a short span of time. Now that does not mean that we are intending to inject people with E. Coli. Just like this mosquito conspiracy theory, that would be a stretch but of course not beyond the imagination of some.
The Plasmodium-carrying mosquitoes are notoriously deadly and could be described as a right nuisance but nonetheless a part of the ecosystem. It is solely responsible for malaria morbidity rate of about 660,000 people and an infection rate of approximately 219 million people annually. To put it into context, every minute, more than one person (mostly children) dies from malaria infection. The etiology of Plasmodium (falciparum, malariae, vivax, etc) infection is such that if it were possible to isolate the female Anopheles mosquito and genetically modify to carry the genetically modified avirulent version of the Plasmodium parasite the incident of malaria infection and death will be eradicated. But how do we do this? It is extremely difficult and near impossible to control the ecosystem and to control what male this female Anopheles mosquito is going to mate with etc, or to indeed be able to genetically modify a significant or the entire population of mosquitoes. However, it is more feasible to develop vaccines (avirulent Plasmodium) to prevent this infection. The war on humans by Plasmodium has increased through the 1990s mainly due to drug-resistant malaria and insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. Despite the intensive research and funding, there has been no effective vaccine that has been introduced into clinical use. So do we give up?
There has been funding lapses in the past. The involvement of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was a call for the global malaria community to shift its paradigm from SUSTAINED CONTROL to ERADICATION. We have a proven track record of being able to do this with other diseases like Polio. This was their aim and was not at all CONSPIRATORIAL in any shape or form. For this to be taken and spun off as part of a conspiracy is truly unbelievable. I know this because I have been involved on many levels and I have seen first hand the devastation of this disease. Everything doesn't always have to revolve around a conspiracy to do us harm. It is a wonder that this fact is always often lost in the quagmire of sensationalized stories like those of Alex Jones'. Alex Jones really needs to come back to earth - the real world. People are dying every minute from malaria as I type this post!
The specific mosquito-like object pictured above is, however, just a conceptual mock-up of a design for a MAV, not a photograph of an actual working device "already in production." And although taking DNA samples or inserting micro-RFID tracking devices under the skin of people are MAV applications that may some day be possible, such possibilities currently appear to be speculative fiction rather than reality.
I don't know why, but these images just remind me of the 1979 Omar Sharif film, Security Hazards Experts [SHE]. I saw that film in the early 1980s when I was a child and I still remember the fantastical bug that could be sent and controlled to inject someone..... lol.
Anyone that says the government does not already have microscopic spy cams built into bugs the size of mosquitoes is obviously not a real person, but in fact a program that mimics the behavior of a person online so that the government can enforce division in opinion. Divide, conquer.
So let's get that out of the way first and fore[..]most.
Anyone that says the government does not already have microscopic spy cams built into bugs the size of mosquitoes is obviously not a real person, but in fact a program that mimics the behavior of a person online so that the government can enforce division in opinion. Divide, conquer.
So let's get that out of the way first and fore[..]most.
Care to explain what you mean by your first sentence please? Are you saying those who do not believe that this bug is already in existence must be computer programs? That would be funny because I am human - honest, you can check my profile page .