Scaramanga
Senior Member
Yes....some of us actually buy these documentaries. I guess someone has to waste some money...so we can see what its all about.
It's another in the style of ' I'm remaining non-commital...but its aliens' pieces that David Paulides is well known for, though in 90 minutes it really doesn't cover that many cases. The entire thing is eyewitness testimony, miles from nowhere, and it mostly relates to UFOs stealing our elk and other animals. Paulides manages to turn a few wild stories in the woods into a full scale conspiracy where both aliens and the government are investigating ( and covering up ) prion diseases in wild animals. That is the essence of the documentary. Oh...and some people go missing too. But despite it being a Missing 411 the whole missing thing is really a secondary element.
The stories are interesting, but ( and this is my main gripe against Paulides ) we are treated to his 'profile points' more times than I care to remember. And I just find it incredibly annoying and unscientific when he argues the profile point ' case is close to water'. I mean, is there anywhere in the national parks and the sort of places that people go to hunt that isn't close to water ? Or there is 'close to rocks and boulders'. Once again this is so vague that one could apply it almost anywhere. How close is close ? The same applies for his 'clusters' of missing people. Given the number of people who go missing it is not at all hard to 'cluster' them as someone who misses out on one cluster can be fitted into another....if one gives no a priori definition of what the range of a cluster is.
So this is really not finally a commital 'it is UFOs' documentary from Paulides....despite it being in the title. It's just more of the same old 'I'm not saying it's aliens...but its aliens'. Nothing to see here. Move along.
It's another in the style of ' I'm remaining non-commital...but its aliens' pieces that David Paulides is well known for, though in 90 minutes it really doesn't cover that many cases. The entire thing is eyewitness testimony, miles from nowhere, and it mostly relates to UFOs stealing our elk and other animals. Paulides manages to turn a few wild stories in the woods into a full scale conspiracy where both aliens and the government are investigating ( and covering up ) prion diseases in wild animals. That is the essence of the documentary. Oh...and some people go missing too. But despite it being a Missing 411 the whole missing thing is really a secondary element.
The stories are interesting, but ( and this is my main gripe against Paulides ) we are treated to his 'profile points' more times than I care to remember. And I just find it incredibly annoying and unscientific when he argues the profile point ' case is close to water'. I mean, is there anywhere in the national parks and the sort of places that people go to hunt that isn't close to water ? Or there is 'close to rocks and boulders'. Once again this is so vague that one could apply it almost anywhere. How close is close ? The same applies for his 'clusters' of missing people. Given the number of people who go missing it is not at all hard to 'cluster' them as someone who misses out on one cluster can be fitted into another....if one gives no a priori definition of what the range of a cluster is.
So this is really not finally a commital 'it is UFOs' documentary from Paulides....despite it being in the title. It's just more of the same old 'I'm not saying it's aliens...but its aliens'. Nothing to see here. Move along.