Huntley Hotel Fire in Santa Monica vs. WTC2 "Molten Metal"

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member

Attachments

Oystein

Senior Member
I am glad you are calling this "embers" - I have for a long time said that there is no evidence the glowing flow was even liquid, and suggested it was embers, or ashes, and no one ever seemed to pick up that suggestion. I always found it to be the most plausible and likely explanation.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Similar flows of embers are see in other building fires. Of course it's hard to find one that's as big as the WTC fires. Also lighting is a factor, daylight comparisons would be preferred.
20171210-170542-4txk1.jpg Source 2:54

20171210-170843-gglcw.jpg
 

John85

Member
A minor fire, quite small, but interesting from the perspective of 9/11 in that it was high-rise building that was dripping orange embers
There is no direct relevance to WTC 2 because NIST claims that it was molten metal that flowed out the building (with embers riding on it), rather than falling embers.

https://www.nist.gov/el/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-investigation
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
There is no direct relevance to WTC 2 because NIST claims that it was molten metal that flowed out the building (with embers riding on it), rather than falling embers.
So? That’s still falling embers, just with some aluminum.
 
Top