How Rare (or Common) are Haloes, Sun Dogs, etc? A Review of the Literature

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
feebdcce0b16d6b6c70852ac8e2d7538.jpg


The above image is one of the earliest representations of a solar halo and two sun dogs (also called parhelia, or "mock suns"). It's dated 1520 and is from the 1552 The Book of Miracles, the German 16th-century manuscript of supernatural phenomena, and looks like it was painted from memory, or from a verbal description. Here's a more modern photograph of a similar configuration
20150825-100508-yu69c.jpg


Halos and sun dogs are formed by ice crystals refracting the light of the sun. They form at specific distances from the sun (due to the angles of the crystal, and the degree to which it bends light). The most common (and smallest) halo forms at 22° around the sun, and hence is known as a 22° Halo. Sun dogs form on either sides of this halo, level with the sun. Sometimes they look like small segments of a rainbow, and sometimes they are very bright, almost as bright as the sun (especially if there is some cloud in front of the sun

People's experiences with halos and sun dogs varies by individual. I remember quite vividly the first time I saw a halo, in 1996, somewhere near Fresno, California. I saw them occasionally when living in Los Angeles, but I noticed a distinct increase in the frequency when I moved 350 miles north to the Sacramento region.

Many people don't notice halos simply because they are so close to the sun, and people avoid looking at the sun, because it hurts your eyes. Halos are best observed when part of the sun is obscured, or indirectly with a digital camera.

So how common are halos? How common are sun dogs? Has the frequency of these things changed over time?

In this excellent time-lapse video, Patrick Roddie documents the occurrence of halos on 21 days in March 2015.

Unfortunately Mr Roddie incorrectly describes the halos as "sun dogs", when in fact no sun dogs appear in the video. But from this we can deduce that halos are fairly common in San Francisco in March, and sun-dogs less so.

But what does history tell us about the frequency of halos and sun dogs? There's quite a history of descriptions of these phenomena, going back hundreds of years.

Notes on historical terminology:
  • In some places halos and sun dogs are referred to as "meteors", which is an old-fashioned term for anything seem in the sky, and not just meteorites)
  • Older books use the terms "halo" and "corona" interchangeably. In more modern usage the term "corona" is used for the irregular rings of iridescence seen much closer to the sun than with halos.
  • Sometimes the size of the halo is referred to by the angular diameter, and not the radius. A normal halo has a radius of 21.7°, usually referred to as 22° halos. But in older works this might be referred to as a 44° diameter halo, or even approximated as "about 45° diameter"

The oldest reference to halos and sun dogs is from Aristotle's meteorology, which was written over two thousand years ago. While his speculation about causes might be a bit off, his observations are fairly accurate. He has quite a long section on this topic.
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/meteorology.3.iii.html
External Quote:
Let us now explain the nature and cause of halo, rainbow, mock suns, and rods, since the same account applies to them all.

We must first describe the phenomena and the circumstances in which each of them occurs. The halo often appears as a complete circle: it is seen round the sun and the moon and bright stars, by night as well as by day, and at midday or in the afternoon, more rarely about sunrise or sunset.
...
Mock suns and rods are always seen by the side of the sun, not above or below it nor in the opposite quarter of the sky. They are not seen at night but always in the neighbourhood of the sun, either as itis rising or setting but more commonly towards sunset.


A Goodly Gallerye with a Most Pleasaunt Prospect: Into the Garden of Naturall Contemplation, to Behold the Naturall Causes of All Kynde of Meteors
, William Fulke: 1563
" (with an archaic spelling, "Halon"):
http://books.google.com/books?id=ebpCAQAAMAAJ&vq=halo&pg=PA34#v=onepage&q&f=false
20150317-070354-hcwqi.jpg

External Quote:
The Circle caled Halon, is a garland of diuerse collours that is seen about the sunne, the Moone, or any other sterre.
Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume the Third, 1773
https://books.google.com/books?id=Ow8UAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA457#v=onepage&q&f=false
20150825-152415-4lcpp.jpg




Or 1813:
https://archive.org/stream/researchesabouta00forsiala#page/100/mode/2up
20150317-071307-fvf8y.jpg


https://archive.org/stream/researchesabouta00forsiala#page/n479/mode/2up
20150317-072026-okcgj.jpg


Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1823
https://books.google.com/books?id=vVQ0AQAAMAAJ&dq=encyclopedia britannica halo&pg=PA673#v=onepage&q=encyclopedia britannica halo&f=false
20150825-153621-yfanh.jpg


The Florida Night Sky, 2002
https://books.google.com/books?id=0NK98MUpOG4C&lpg=PA65&dq=parhelia rare common&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false
20150825-151415-05s6c.jpg


Color and Light in Nature, 2001
https://books.google.com/books?id=4Abp5FdhskAC&lpg=PA171&pg=PA171#v=onepage&q&f=false
20150825-151818-az2z8.jpg

20150825-151855-quuvi.jpg


The Atmospheric Optics web site give figures for the frequency of the various types of halo in days per year, with the 22° halo being 100 days per year, which is about twice a week. Parhelia (sun dogs) are seen once or twice a week. This will vary by location and time of year.
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/whyinfr.htm
20160120-213156-40phl.jpg


The figures are also averages. This does not mean you will see halos exactly twice a week. You might see none for a month and they see them every day for two weeks. See: http://personal.inet.fi/koti/luuk3/halot/
 
Last edited:
External Quote:
As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.
The KJV, Ezekiel 1:28 (http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/1-28.htm)

Was this one of the earliest mentions of a solar halo? The Book of Ezekiel is thought to have been written around 590 BC. Not long before the Greeks mentioned them.

Ezekiel.jpg
http://www.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/~stan/skyart.html (chapter 3)
 
Earthquake lights. :) We did have an event not long and not too far (200 miles, from Patrick's POV, of course, as far as I know they were unrelated.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/ci37528064#general_region USGS.jpg

It seems, atmospheric conditions throughout a good portion of California were conducive for refraction and diffraction events to occur. I caught this sundog a few minutes before 5:00 pm,

DSCF1333.JPG

Using the method describe on http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/circular.htm

22halo.jpg

It was a sundog, with a portion of a 22° halo. It faded quickly, as the sun sank. 3 minutes later another "rainbow" appeared double the distance, away, it wasn't as brilliant, and you need to look close.

DSCF1339.JPG

Last night, the reaction to this atmospheric phenomenon wa a bit different. Last night, for the first time, people in my area first reported to the news stations, how they looked up to the sky and found something wrong.

kgetdutch.jpg


This is one of the most interesting reactions to the sundog, I've found.



The original video with these comments, can be found, here. https://www.facebook.com/mark.ortiz.142/videos/1278557218827443/?pnref=story

MarkOrtiz.jpg


I sure wish these people would take a look at this page, http://www.atoptics.co.uk/
 
Last edited:
Googling "ion engines" gives some interesting reads. Googling "color change atmospheric molecules", less so.
 
Googling "ion engines" gives some interesting reads. Googling "color change atmospheric molecules", less so.

Halos and sun dogs are not the result of individual molecules though (which would cause scattering), they are the result of relatively large ice crystals, which cause refraction.
 
Sorry, yes, I was being obtuse - my point was the Facebook poster leapt to the conclusion that this was "an ion engine jumping" despite obviously having a tenuous grasp on basic scientific principles and terms.

The second search term would at least have eventually led him to, umm, enlightenment but confirmation bias is a very real thing.
 

Latest posts

Trending content

Back
Top