About 4 or 5 posts ago - have you forgotten already??Where did I claim I have "no precedent"?
Are you denying that you wrote:
You are correct. There is no precedent, because all precedent in fact contradicts what we have been told about 9/11.
I have stated I do have precedent which contradicts the events of 9/11.... and I provided a source.
Make up your mind.
Well, that isn't very polite.. .is it?It is, at best, stupid hyperbole....
Seems fine to me...and also accurate.
I notice that you are avoiding the actual issue - saying that there was NO evidence when there is evidence, saying there was NO wind tunnel testing when there was wind tunnel testing.
Care to address those at all?