Debunk This New JFK Information

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
So in your 'black and white' world view if someone doesn't believe a piece of bunk or a conspiracy they are giving officials and politicians a free pass? That type of thinking is what conspiracy theorist do, they see everything as 100% for or 100% against the official story. You will find that many skeptics here have a lot more grey in their thinking than that.

You should just try and stick with the facts and that is bullets don't impart much force onto people when they are shot.
More like in your "black and white" world view if someone questions the official story, they're automatically a conspiracy theorist. There is no gray in your views, don't lie to me. :)
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
More like in your "black and white" world view if someone questions the official story, they're automatically a conspiracy theorist. There is no gray in your views, don't lie to me. :)
[...] Your logical fallacy arguments are getting old.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
Typical troll activity. Your logical fallacy arguments are getting old.
So how does the recorded conversation of Milteer specifically saying how Kennedy was going to be killed and how someone else was going to be framed for it... and then bragging about it after it happened... fit into your model of the world?
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
There very well could have been a conspiracy to kill JFK but the lone gunman theory to me is the most plausible theory. Bet you didn't think I would say that did you? [...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Grieves

Senior Member
I don't think there was much awareness even at the instinctual level, just a muscular spasm, random.
It's not a particularly spasmodic motion, is it?
Mrs. Kennedy is trying to find out what is wrong after the first shot that hit him. If she is imparting any kind of backwards force upon him and he is resisting and the head shot kills him instantly then it is a possibility that the sudden action of him going limp caused her to push him back.
She seems to have both hands on his arm. Doesn't look like she's exerting any pressure on his chest.

The bullet causing him to fly back is movie physics. It just doesn't happen that way in real life. No official story needed to remove that particular piece of bunk.
He doesn't fly back though, does he? That's an argument I keep hearing... '..it's not like the movies, yo..!' yeah, well, neither was this. JFK stays in his seat, doesn't he? He's struck by something, and his head and shoulders are seemingly propelled in a backward slumping motion. To imply that having a bullet pass through two layers of a persons skull applies no force to their head/torso is flat out wrong. It's not nearly enough force to actually propel their entire weight any distance, true.. but what does that have to do with what's happening here?
For some context, watch this with particular attention to the 9 second mark on. Go back to it a couple of times and watch it again. Then tell me a bullet from a high powered rifle passing through Kenedy's head didn't have the force to cause him to jerk back and slump.
 
Last edited:

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
I'm seriously laughing my ass off at showing a paintball shooting someone. You can say bullets will cause someone to move in a direction all you want, but it just doesn't happen that way. If that is the case then why doesn't this .50 cal bullet make the pig fly back?
Skip ahead to 6:50

Paintball! LOL
 

Grieves

Senior Member
I'm seriously laughing my ass off at showing a paintball shooting someone. You can say bullets will cause someone to move in a direction all you want, but it just doesn't happen that way. If that is the case then why doesn't this .50 cal bullet make the pig fly back?
Skip ahead to 6:50

Paintball! LOL
I'm uncomfortable with linking videos of various real-world scenarios of people being shot in the head, but if you search Liveleak, in the Syria section, there's no shortage. Spoiler: they tend to jerk backward and fall. In any event, the video is relevant. The force of an exploding paintball was enough to send that kid's head snapping back like he'd taken a stiff jab. You're arguing having your skull blown out violently couldn't cause a person's head to lurch back a little.

As to your video, it's 10 minutes.... what pig? Not watching the whole thing, so I skipped to the end where the pertinent shit seemed to be. They shot a dummy. The momentum propelled the dummy backward shortly and caused it to fall. No, it didn't go flying... but obviously the momentum of the bullet had an effect. Is that what you're referring too? If not,
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
I'm uncomfortable with linking videos of various real-world scenarios of people being shot in the head, but if you search Liveleak, in the Syria section, there's no shortage. Spoiler: they tend to jerk backward and fall. In any event, the video is relevant. The force of an exploding paintball was enough to send that kid's head snapping back like he'd taken a stiff jab. You're arguing having your skull blown out violently couldn't cause a person's head to lurch back a little.

As to your video, it's 10 minutes.... what pig? Not watching the whole thing, so I skipped to the end where the pertinent shit seemed to be. They shot a dummy. The momentum propelled the dummy backward shortly and caused it to fall. No, it didn't go flying... but obviously the momentum of the bullet had an effect. Is that what you're referring too? If not,
You obviously didn't read my whole post if you didn't see where I say to skip ahead. Your argument is [...] not based on real world physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
In both of these videos, the person being shot in the face is anticipating and bracing for it.
Or the kid in your video just reacts to being shot in the head. Have you ever been paint balling? Getting hit in the head doesn't make someone fall down or their head to fling back. [...]
[Admin: politeness edits]
 

Grieves

Senior Member
Or the kid in your video just reacts to being shot in the head. Have you ever been paint balling? Getting hit in the head doesn't make someone fall down or their head to fling back. It really is an ignorant argument.
I used to paintball all the time, yes. Own my own mask, own my own gun. When you get shot in the mask, you feel the force of it. No, it doesn't send an adult cartwheeling like an idiot, but you do stiffen your neck and shoulders whenever it happens. If you get shot multiple times in the mask, it's going to be your neck that hurts when you get out, not your face.

[...]

[Admin: off topic stuff removed]
 

Robert

New Member
Bullets don't impart much momentum to people.
Bullets don't impart much momentum to people.


Sir, what I'm about to say next is in no way meant to offend you or start a flame on this topic but you can't be expected to be taken seriously with that statement. Mr. West this website is chockful of instances where your critical skills are in fine form. This is not one of those instances.
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
There very well could have been a conspiracy to kill JFK but the lone gunman theory to me is the most plausible theory. Bet you didn't think I would say that did you? [...]
Even when you have direct evidence indicating that the theory is a sham?
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Sir, what I'm about to say next is in no way meant to offend you or start a flame on this topic but you can't be expected to be taken seriously with that statement. Mr. West this website is chockful of instances where your critical skills are in fine form. This is not one of those instances.

How so particularly? A bullet's mass and energy simply slices through a person, it doesn't transfer it to the larger body around it unless it is offered enough resistance to transfer that energy. Flesh typically does not have that much resistance to a bullet, hence their popularity as instruments of death and wounding.
 

Robert

New Member
Has anyone here actually witnessed what a high power assault rifle can do to a living target? Serious question. I'm asking that because the assertion that it wouldn't impart the violent momentum on display in the Zapruder film is false - and should really tie up that aspect of this debate . I don't know what happened that day except that a man was shot in the head and overwhelming forensic evidence, eye witness corroboration, and of course video taped evidence lmao shows that the chances of Oswald pulling off this murder is infetismal at best and likely not at all possible. I don't get " debunkers " on this one ( or the 9/11 report ) This isn't chemtrails. This isn't Niburu. This is a murder , caught on video no less , and the debunking community is trying to prove an official theory that's so suspicious and outlandish just on its own textual merits alone, to be true. Try to solve this murder, because it was not solved. I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist whatsoever and with that said I believe that the way debunkers go about defending the Warren Commission ( and the 911 report) is a deplorable and a sick display of codependency to Americanism. And in both cases humans were violently murdered and justice was never meted.
 

Robert

New Member
How so particularly? A bullet's mass and energy simply slices through a person, it doesn't transfer it to the larger body around it unless it is offered enough resistance to transfer that energy. Flesh typically does not have that much resistance to a bullet, hence their popularity as instruments of death and wounding.



A simple video search will render a plethora of evidence of the nature of a high caliber rifles impact -and on pretty much any target that you wanna see hit, so be careful if you have a squeamish stomach......or just go hunting with a 40.06 or ak47 and you can really experience it yourself..
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
A simple video search will render a plethora of evidence of the nature of a high caliber rifles impact -and on pretty much any target that you wanna see hit, so be careful if you have a squeamish stomach......or just go hunting with a 40.06 or ak47 and you can really experience it yourself..

But it does not necessarily impart much velocity. Especially if they are sitting down. It's not like Hollywood.

Here's a video of ACTUAL PEOPLE GETTING SHOT IN THE HEAD
(link)
There's a variety of reactions, but they mostly just drop.
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
Robert is right.. debunkers stick to chemtrails, Nibiru, ghosts, aliens, etc.
Has anyone here actually witnessed what a high power assault rifle can do to a living target? Serious question. I'm asking that because the assertion that it wouldn't impart the violent momentum on display in the Zapruder film is false - and should really tie up that aspect of this debate . I don't know what happened that day except that a man was shot in the head and overwhelming forensic evidence, eye witness corroboration, and of course video taped evidence lmao shows that the chances of Oswald pulling off this murder is infetismal at best and likely not at all possible. I don't get " debunkers " on this one ( or the 9/11 report ) This isn't chemtrails. This isn't Niburu. This is a murder , caught on video no less , and the debunking community is trying to prove an official theory that's so suspicious and outlandish just on its own textual merits alone, to be true. Try to solve this murder, because it was not solved. I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist whatsoever and with that said I believe that the way debunkers go about defending the Warren Commission ( and the 911 report) is a deplorable and a sick display of codependency to Americanism. And in both cases humans were violently murdered and justice was never meted.
Real talk... it's not fair to push legitimate things like JFK assassination and 9/11 under the same umbrella with things like chemtrails, ghosts, morgellons, aliens, and etc.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Robert is right.. debunkers stick to chemtrails, Nibiru, ghosts, aliens, etc.

Real talk... it's not fair to push legitimate things like JFK assassination and 9/11 under the same umbrella with things like chemtrails, ghosts, morgellons, aliens, and etc.

How do you determine the difference?
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
The whole point of the CIA psyop was to categorize any form of questioning of the official narrative of events with the wild and crazy like "elvis is an alien" and "government is adding chemicals into food to turn people gay" and etc. With JFK and 9/11 there is plethora of evidence conflicting the official stories. When the official story itself is the most outrageous of all 'conspiracy theories' then it needs to be treated with the same level of skepticism.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The whole point of the CIA psyop was to categorize any form of questioning the official narrative of events with the wild and crazy like "elvis is an alien" and "government is adding chemicals into food to turn people gay" and etc. With JFK and 9/11 there is plethora of evidence conflicting the official stories. When the official story is the most outrageous of all 'conspiracy theories' then it needs to be treated with the same level of skepticism.

Yeah, but why is JFK & 9/11 "legitimate", but chemtrails and aliens are not? Is there not also a "plethora of evidence" for them?
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
Because your question was already answered. The only evidence is in your mind.
So what you're saying is Milteer specifically laying out how JFK was going to be taken out and how they were going to blame it on some patsy to "throw the public off" ... and then bragging about it aftwards... is all in my mind, huh?

You're defending your baseless beliefs the way Christians defend the bible.

And no, you haven't answered the question.
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
I don't have to answer your question though do I? Take it how you want, it is what you're going to do anyway.
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
Because you know to answer means death to your baseless belief system based on complete and utter lies.
It doesn't really matter what I say or don't say because you will just still keep on believing what you want to believe and end up thinking you won anyway so we have wound up in the same place all with out me having to answer in the first place.
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
It doesn't really matter what I say or don't say because you will just still keep on believing what you want to believe and end up thinking you won anyway so we have wound up in the same place all with out me having to answer in the first place.
I'm not trying to win anything. This is not a war. I just want you to see the truth and I believe you have the same motivation as well. We're on the same team.
 

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
The point of that statement was when you have direct evidence like the intercepted police recording of Milteer contradicting the official narrative that you've taken for granted .. you have to be willing to let go of some of those beliefs that were based on the official narrative, no?
 
Last edited:

Alchemist

Banned
Banned
How do you know?
I used to think ghosts, aliens and chemtrails were real but I've been convinced otherwise now after spending a good amount of time on this site reading all the debunking so I can confidently say most of that is bunk. :)
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Edward Current Does the beginning part of Gimbal debunk the claim that the object rotates? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 3
Daves! What tools are there to debunk pictures Practical Debunking 24
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
Rory Explained: How Mount Rainier helps demonstrate the shape of the globe Flat Earth 38
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
George Tasker Using pin hole lenses to debunk CGI Rebuttals of Photos of Earth Curvature Flat Earth 7
Tom Binney Does my FE Debunk in this case make sense to you guys? Practical Debunking 23
derwoodii My eyes deceived me so I had to debunk myself Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
N How can I debunk the orbs in this photo? UFOs and Aliens 22
HoaxEye How to calculate the visible fraction of the Earth [e.g. 1972 Blue Marble, Apollo 17] Flat Earth 29
N Please help me to debunk this topic: stranges sphere outside of the ISS. General Discussion 18
Mick West Fireproof Cabbage, Burning Snow, Flat Earth - Are Some Things too Silly to Debunk? Practical Debunking 7
Mick West Burying the Debunk: How Fake News about "Pyramids" in Antarctica Creates False Balance Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 2
TWCobra Flat earth Debunk-change in apparent altitude of clouds as seen from airliner Flat Earth 2
Mick West An Easy Experiment to Debunk the Flat Earth by Observing the Size of the Sun Flat Earth 55
passionfly1 Lets finally debunk Nico and Marco Kaschuba (video hoaxers) People Debunked 0
Svartbjørn The Solar System.. To Scale (just for fun, nothing to debunk here) General Discussion 0
Mick West What to do about the Flat Earthers? Debunk, or ignore? Flat Earth 238
Critical Thinker Why we debunk and who do we reach. Practical Debunking 2
C MH370: Help me debunk this General Discussion 21
TemplarJLS Can someone debunk this George Washington quote? Quotes Debunked 6
TemplarJLS Some depopulation quotes to debunk? Quotes Debunked 16
Henk001 High altitude clouds don't have a cooling effect Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Mike Fl Can someone debunk this? Sandy Hook Shooting 100% Fraud Proof in 2 mins. - Photo Time Analysis Sandy Hook 21
Stevan Gvozdenovic Let's debunk my (very simple) perpetuum mobile Science and Pseudoscience 57
M Debunk: The horizon never falling as proof of flat Earth theory Flat Earth 29
WeedWhacker Let's imagine the actual area of the sky, above.... Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Dan Wilson PopSci article claiming to debunk ten GMO myths Health and Quackery 10
Vindog Debunk this [Planes at different altitude and different contrails over France] Contrails and Chemtrails 43
Critical Thinker Gawker article: Why I Write About (and Debunk) the Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory Contrails and Chemtrails 0
W Debunk NASA is proposing spraying stratospheric aerosols. Contrails and Chemtrails 9
T Debunk: Chemtrails leave no space between aircraft and the beginning of the trail. Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Jeffrey Orling Is there anything about 9/11 left to debunk 9/11 46
C Help debunk please!? [Contrail Grids, Weather Modification, Fuel Dumping] Contrails and Chemtrails 18
George B Debunk: Kinder gentler Debunking is better. . . ?? Practical Debunking 38
Noblelox Practical bunk used to debunk Boston Marathon Bombings 18
Alchemist Please Debunk: The Drills (conflicting info from 2 reputable sources) Boston Marathon Bombings 13
David Fraser Should we debunk "hoax" tragedies with "crisis actors"? Practical Debunking 21
DebunkingShills Orbs: Something the metaJUNK shills just can't debunk. Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Joe Newman There will be widescale rioting after Zimmerman verdict. Debunk, please Conspiracy Theories 256
Mick West Using Campaign Finance Reform to Debunk Conspiracy Theories Practical Debunking 25
Z please someone debunk this crap Contrails and Chemtrails 15
BlindIdiots Please Debunk WeatherWar101s "Weather War Big Picture" Video Contrails and Chemtrails 5
Soulfly DOJ investigation of the AP debunk the government controlling the media? General Discussion 0
Oxymoron Easy WTC 7 Video to Debunk 9/11 2
sgirl Col. Richard French of the USAF States his Job was to Debunk UFOs - Citizen Hearing Conspiracy Theories 6
N Little help to debunk clouds with color Practical Debunking 2
Rroval Debunk: imgur: "Boston Truth Revealed" Boston Marathon Bombings 84
Drew Debunk: Saudi National Linked Boston Marathon Bombings 5
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top