Claim: Crashed Disc - Sierra Ladrones, NM [Rainwater Catchment - Removed]

Does the map incude an OSM tag for the catchements? i.e. man_made=water_catchement. I wonder if all catchements in New Mexico can be plotted in Overpass Turbo.
The app is interesting you can "add" different map layers, so like having the hunting map and a satellite map and it will composite them at 50% transparency and overlay markers from both. But there doesn't seem to be any feature in the app to show metadata for markers, and it doesn't appear to have OSM integration.
 
The obvious trail coming in from the left side of these images clearly shows that people know there is something there of interest. People hike to this location and then turn around and go back the way they came. Funny how none of them ever reported the flying saucer sitting there.
If the thing was built there, there once must have been some primitive road used to transport it, probably in segments. And if it was a source of water for animals, perhaps it was visited regularly by wildlife investigators.
 
I downloaded the CarryMap application on my phone and the "New Mexico Hunting Recreation Map" as described here:

https://www.blm.gov/maps/frequently...nting-maps#DownloadInformationandInstructions

The map has various BLM features marked and shows a catchment at these coordinates:

View attachment 71027View attachment 71028

Edit: The other similar looking gray one is also marked as a catchment.
View attachment 71029

@Mick West thread title can be changed. Monkeysage nailed it.
 
This guy on Reddit is currently going to take a look:
Capture.JPG

Any more news on menntu? I'm worried he/ she might have bumped into one of the armed private UFO retrieval teams recently espoused by Gary Nolan ;). -More seriously, if they were on their way to the thingy, let's hope they had a safe trip.

It looks like MrBBB666 (who made us aware of the "crashed flying disc" in the OP) was misled by the lifted apron of a bighorn guzzler in a remote location. Let's hope he's learnt that caution should go hand in hand with enthusiasm.
 
The thing reminds me of the Cote de Lago thing in Costa Rica. I don't think we ever considered the possibility that that was an actual physical structure. It probably wasn't - at least, not one like the one discussed here. For a start, the Cote de Largo thing was much bigger. Also, it was lying in shallow water. Unless it had blown down the hill, it could hardly be a rainwater collector. Still, it is a salutary reminder that some odd things may be visible from the air. I look forward to the first time that a Frank Lloyd Wright house is mistaken for a UAP. That also reminds me of the time when one of Wright's clients complained that the roof leaked (a notorious problem with his buildings). On being asked why his roofs leaked, Wright replied 'That's so you can tell it's the roof.'
 
Any more news on menntu? I'm worried he/ she might have bumped into one of the armed private UFO retrieval teams recently espoused by Gary Nolan ;). -More seriously, if they were on their way to the thingy, let's hope they had a safe trip.

It looks like MrBBB666 (who made us aware of the "crashed flying disc" in the OP) was misled by the lifted apron of a bighorn guzzler in a remote location. Let's hope he's learnt that caution should go hand in hand with enthusiasm.
Article:
Edit: It's Tuesday, 6:48 am. I went to bed excited, and I woke up with a headache, and a sense that I need to reschedule my plans to when the temps are cooler. The high for Bernardo, NM today is around 88, and though that's later in the day, I have to account for the time/ability to cross multiple washes off Salado Road to get as close as possible to the ridge line. We had more rain overnight in the region, and that may play into the quality of the roads/gullies/washes. Simply put, I woke up not feeling optimum, and with this kind of venture, I need 100% of me in place. To this end, given my work and flight schedule, I'm going to resume the hunt on September 22, a Sunday. I'm also going to plot several paths on Google Earth and put those out so you can see the specific excursion route.

Thanks so much to the zillion of you for maps, images, private property lines info, possible course projections, and most of all for joining me in the last 24 hours of adventure - I could feel the excitement and encouragement, as well as the cautionary notes here and there. I'm a bit chagrined as you can imagine, but I know myself well enough to back off when appropriate. For those who want to follow or be notified, put September 22 on your Reddit reminders.
 
The thing reminds me of the Cote de Lago thing in Costa Rica. I don't think we ever considered the possibility that that was an actual physical structure. It probably wasn't -...
Yeah, it does not seem to be there in frame 299, if not it can't be a structure!
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/1971-lake-cote-lago-de-cote-ufo-aerial-photo.11729/post-248485

Further discussion of that, and whether the object or artifact is visible in another location in other frame(s) probably should carry on in that thread. See y'all over there!
 
That took not too long
I was following and didn't want to interject with a linear thing. But as I'm new here, it's a first chance to ask...

Why is there an entire genre of bunk with false premises that semi-supernatural beings get here across space-time or light years and then, like a desert just reaches out and grabs 'em when they're being terrible drivers with worse technology than a Tesla?
 
I was following and didn't want to interject with a linear thing. But as I'm new here, it's a first chance to ask...

Why is there an entire genre of bunk with false premises that semi-supernatural beings get here across space-time or light years and then, like a desert just reaches out and grabs 'em when they're being terrible drivers with worse technology than a Tesla?
<** puts on ufologist hat **> Because the original crew died millennia ago, and there being nothing in space to bump into, their descendants don't know how to drive? But obviously they came from a desert planet and thus think a desert location must be the kind of site they seek...
 
Any more news on menntu?
Likely he'll make it to the water catchment and feel some disapointment, but he may stumble across some shards of missle fragment which could be mistaken for extraterrestrial tech....so in an effort to pre-debunk that it might be useful info for people to know the area is littered with shrapnel from various clean up operations. For example:
Albuquerque_Journal_2016_10_31_Page_A005.jpg

Ladron Peaks and red arrow pointing at the water catchment.
Screenshot 2024-08-27 at 20.15.18.png

Source:https://peakery.com/ladron-peak-new-mexico/map/
 
Last edited:
Useful info from @deirdre about Reddit member menntu's progress, posted here

External Quote:
Edit: It's Tuesday, 6:48 am. I went to bed excited, and I woke up with a headache, and a sense that I need to reschedule my plans to when the temps are cooler. The high for Bernardo, NM today is around 88, and though that's later in the day, I have to account for the time/ability to cross multiple washes off Salado Road to get as close as possible to the ridge line. We had more rain overnight in the region, and that may play into the quality of the roads/gullies/washes. Simply put, I woke up not feeling optimum, and with this kind of venture, I need 100% of me in place. To this end, given my work and flight schedule, I'm going to resume the hunt on September 22, a Sunday.
I got the impression in the Reddit conversation posted by Mick West that Menntu was claiming to be en route:

Capture.JPG


What do others think?
 
Somebody active on reddit might link Menntu to how the thing has now been identified, and while it would be fun to see some on-site images, it is not worth taking any risks as the mystery is solved already
 
Somebody active on reddit might link Menntu to how the thing has now been identified, and while it would be fun to see some on-site images, it is not worth taking any risks as the mystery is solved already
Good call. I messaged him. I still want to see what it looks like close up though!
 
Somebody active on reddit might link Menntu to how the thing has now been identified, and while it would be fun to see some on-site images, it is not worth taking any risks as the mystery is solved already
I posted a link back here in the thread, saying it had been identified. It might have got lost though.
 
Somebody active on reddit might link Menntu to how the thing has now been identified, and while it would be fun to see some on-site images, it is not worth taking any risks as the mystery is solved already
i PMed him the MB link earlier today. and a reddit link saying it was the hardest hike (and why). He still likes the adventure ..so right now is still planning on going. I told him to bring bear spray because of the bear and mountain lions, and to watch youtubers who hiked it as the terrain looks very rough. He needs to plan the map out better he said as he ran into "washes" etc . If he goes he'll be better prepared i'm sure. (He said ok to the bear spray).
 
musically inclined?

I thought snakes were deaf, quick check on Wikipedia and that's not so
External Quote:
Up until as late as the mid 20th century it was assumed snakes could not hear.[53][54] In fact snakes have two distinct and wholly independent systems. One of these systems, the somatic, involves transmission of frequencies through ventral skin receptors via the spine. The other system involves vibrations that are transmitted through the snake's attenuated lung to the brain via cranial nerve. A snake's sensitivity to vibration is extremely high.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake

...But musically inclined?! There's Kaa in The Jungle Book film, 1967, "Trust in meeeee, just in meee...." but he's a python.

Maybe a humorous pop-culture reference? Any pop/ rock/ C&W hits referencing diamondbacks? Or recent animations with a musical snake?

-Just did a quick search using "song diamondback", there is a song "Diamondback" released by country artist Carly Pierce, September 2021, but it's not about a snake, despite the spelling:

External Quote:
...But you ain't gonna get this diamond back
No never ever gettin' this diamond back
You can keep the dog and the Cadillac
But you ain't gonna get this diamond back
 
I was following and didn't want to interject with a linear thing. But as I'm new here, it's a first chance to ask...

Why is there an entire genre of bunk with false premises that semi-supernatural beings get here across space-time or light years and then, like a desert just reaches out and grabs 'em when they're being terrible drivers with worse technology than a Tesla?
That's a good question for the ChitChat forum (not this topic, which is about the catchment that looks like a flying saucer).
See also our previous threads at
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/anti-gravity-travel-and-still-crashing-discussion.13105/
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/ha...o-explain-the-crash-rate-of-these-ufos.13032/
Feel free to respond there!
 
Last edited:
Are there similar structures elsewhere?
In an effort to map all similar structures in New Mexico with Overpass Turbo you can get limited results looking for the tags man_made=storage_tank content=water, or man_made=water_well.

Example query:
[out:json][timeout:60];
area(3600162014)->.searchArea;
node["man_made"="water_well"](area.searchArea);
out body;
It returns many results which are round-shaped storage facilities, a handful of which appear to have round guzzler-like structures near them. There doesn't appear to be a specific tag that brings up the exact kind of catchment tanks on Sierra Ladrones, but maybe i'm missing something obvious.

Some examples:
33.621029095671105, -107.49139433194914
Holdup Tank.png

33.78376849462025, -107.16119845157242
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 13.27.22.png

36.7366660457834, -105.71210841941424
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 14.37.56.png

33.4891853, -107.319545
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 15.50.44.png

33.4395911, -107.5355532
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 15.53.44.png

32.4034782, -108.2095631
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 15.59.35.png
 
In an effort to map all similar structures in New Mexico with Overpass Turbo you can get limited results looking for the tags man_made=storage_tank content=water, or man_made=water_well.

Example query:

It returns many results which are round-shaped storage facilities, a handful of which appear to have round guzzler-like structures near them. There doesn't appear to be a specific tag that brings up the exact kind of catchment tanks on Sierra Ladrones, but maybe i'm missing something obvious.

Some examples:
33.621029095671105, -107.49139433194914
View attachment 71072
33.78376849462025, -107.16119845157242
View attachment 71073
36.7366660457834, -105.71210841941424
View attachment 71074
33.4891853, -107.319545
View attachment 71075
33.4395911, -107.5355532
View attachment 71076
32.4034782, -108.2095631
View attachment 71077

Fascinating tool. I couldn't find anything on Google Maps in my region visually, but searching for storage_tank with overpass turbo I found this hatch covering an entrance to Hollow Earth water tank.
1724863173083.png
 
To mitigate the potential dangers to people hiking to the site to look for a crashed flying saucer, I thought it would be simpler to ask the Bureau of Land Management about the site. Their field officer was able to provide recent photos.

They replied to my email with:
Attached are photos of the replacement water development which was installed in May 2024. The old fiberglass water development was disassembled and flown out.
There are several similar old fiberglass water developments located within remote areas of the Field Office that we have identified for replacement that I am sure will be included on the online conspiracy claiming that such water catchment tanks are claimed to be crashed flying saucer sites. [Bold added]
Below is one of their photos taken on 23 April 2024 at 10:54am, along with Google Earth and Peakery Image to show that it's the same location. Two additional images taken the same day follow.

The replacement catchment system now more closely resembles the equipment shown in the historical photos in #2.
IMG_0559 copy.jpg

IMG_0560.jpg

IMG_0558.jpg

The above image as seen in Google Earth Pro.
Screenshot 2024-08-30 at 18.53.53.png
 
Last edited:
To mitigate the potential dangers to people hiking to the site to look for a crashed flying saucer, I thought it would be simpler to ask the Bureau of Land Management about the site. Their field officer was able to provide recent photos.
Nice. The Chamber and the Sheriff never replied to me.
 
I'm kind of questioning the usefulness of putting effort into debunking something that doesn't seem to need debunking in the first place. We live in a world full of people, who among other things, sometimes build round things and leave them laying around. Was there any reason whatsoever to think that this might have been connected to ufos instead? Doesn't putting the work into debunking this give it a certain amount of legitimacy that it didn't even come close to deserving?
 
I'm kind of questioning the usefulness of putting effort into debunking something that doesn't seem to need debunking in the first place. We live in a world full of people, who among other things, sometimes build round things and leave them laying around. Was there any reason whatsoever to think that this might have been connected to ufos instead? Doesn't putting the work into debunking this give it a certain amount of legitimacy that it didn't even come close to deserving?
I was seeing this particular claimed UFO on several sites. The points you raised about there being no real reason to suspect is had ever flown, and discussing various round structures. Those arguments were not carrying the day (always assuming anybody in these discussions was sincere, and they weren't all just larping as gullible UFO fans, I suppose!)

Given that it was getting traction as a UFO, it was worth it, I think, to put it definitely to bed. NOTHING will ever convince all believers -- but now there are pictures taken from the site that shows what it is. It is about as fully debunked as is possible, that will at least help some folks not to be fooled.
 
I'm kind of questioning the usefulness of putting effort into debunking something that doesn't seem to need debunking in the first place.
What are you going to do about it, dock our pay? ;)
It's a hobby.

If you feel we should rather be debunking something else, please start a thread on it.
 
I was seeing this particular claimed UFO on several sites. The points you raised about there being no real reason to suspect is had ever flown, and discussing various round structures. Those arguments were not carrying the day (always assuming anybody in these discussions was sincere, and they weren't all just larping as gullible UFO fans, I suppose!)

Given that it was getting traction as a UFO, it was worth it, I think, to put it definitely to bed. NOTHING will ever convince all believers -- but now there are pictures taken from the site that shows what it is. It is about as fully debunked as is possible, that will at least help some folks not to be fooled.

If there were something novel here sure. But what is the message supposed to be to those people? That everything that doesn't have an immediate and definite explanation needs investigation? It seems the real problem here is not specifically what this object is, but the imaginary reasons people conjured up to focus on it in the first place. Ok, sure, identify it as long as you're at it, but the real focus should be on the latter problem.
 
It seems the real problem here is not specifically what this object is, but the imaginary reasons people conjured up to focus on it in the first place.
they focus on it because it looks like a flying saucer that crashed into a mountain and they get comfort (or are afraid) that a more intelligent civilization might exist and care about us enough to visit.

we're supposed to solve the problem of their hopes and fears?

i think researching wildlife water containment tanks and learning about the very cool wildlife in that area that i learned about (wild horses, donkeys, sheep, elk, lions, bears etc etc) and how exactly man-kind is working to help them WOULD be a distraction from the primary issue. no?

plus modeling how people can investigate and research things also helps dampen hope and/or alleviate fears. If you have a better method..have it. Most members here arent super interested in psychology, we just enjoy solving mysteries.
 
I'm kind of questioning the usefulness of putting effort into debunking something that doesn't seem to need debunking in the first place. We live in a world full of people, who among other things, sometimes build round things and leave them laying around. Was there any reason whatsoever to think that this might have been connected to ufos instead? Doesn't putting the work into debunking this give it a certain amount of legitimacy that it didn't even come close to deserving?
There was no reason to think it was connected to UFOs, but the video and it's bunk claims gained immediate traction on social media - 45k YouTube views in a few days - many people (whether ernestly or not) were considering it a UFO mystery and perhaps intending to put themelves at risk to investigate the site in person.

This was easy, and fun, to disprove, and was done so at a distance with open-source tools available to anyone online. What the video shows is no longer there and it has zero relation to UFOs.

What's more useful is understanding how misinformation, if unchecked, spreads on social media - media which some people trust more than mainstream / legacy media. Exposing the bald-face lies people tell to promote that misinformation is certainly a worthy pursuit.

Perhaps you should be questioning the motivation of those promoting this content instead?

Michael Bradbury's YouTube page
D8B51B1A-EA62-425D-93B0-F9883F035A00_1_201_a.jpeg

One of the early promters of the same with 138 retweets, 263k views.
9CF44458-1079-401A-B57C-2A4BF7DDF46D_1_201_a.jpeg
 
If there were something novel here sure.
It was reasonably novel -- I can't recall ever having heard of a "guzzler" animal watering systm, much less one being claimed as a UFO.

But what is the message supposed to be to those people?
Which people? Firm believers -- maybe not much, but some number of them will see one case that turned out to be nothing much of interest. To folks being drawn in to the entrance to the UFO Rabbit Hole by seeing this case, "it is provably not a UFO" is a good message!

That everything that doesn't have an immediate and definite explanation needs investigation?
What metric would you propose to decide which UFO claims we should investigate? To me, "it is getting traction and people are beleiving it" is sufficient, but I'm interested in your thoughts if they are different.

It seems the real problem here is not specifically what this object is, but the imaginary reasons people conjured up to focus on it in the first place. Ok, sure, identify it as long as you're at it, but the real focus should be on the latter problem.
I'd be very interested in your thoughts on how to go about that. In the meantime, this is a site with the goal of debunking specific false claims. This was a specific, and false, claim. It fit the "profile" for this site to consider it.

MODS -- This is a potentially interesting topic, but does not really belong in this thread and if it goes anywhere it would be unfortunate if it got lost at the end of a thread whose topic has really run out... maybe split it off?
 

I'm having a damn hard time concentrating right now (optical migraine), but I'll try to make some kind of a response. Though my thoughts are scattered, so this might all be a bunch of noise.

I don't see anyone looking at this and being confronted by new phenomena that should challenge their perception. So I don't know what there is to take home from this other than the reasons why this was connected to ufos at all were so spurious that it wouldn't really matter if the object were never identified.

But I can't put myself into the mindset of someone who would actually entertain that this wasn't just some other damn thing that was round, so I guess I don't know what they would take home from it. Yeah, I don't know. I'm happy to drop it.
 
Last edited:
I don't see anyone looking at this and being confronted by new phenomena that should challenge their perception. So I don't know what there is to take home from this other than the reasons why this was connected to ufos at all were so spurious that it wouldn't really matter if the object were never identified.
Support you.

I just think it's a facet of the board. I sort of assume most are skeptical. Most of this is entertainment, certainly avocational.

This whole thing's been pretty well resolved and depending on one's level of membership, the entertainment value is kind of safeguarded. Ultimately, you and I have had similar reactions, at appropriate times.

It's fine it was all taken seriously and played out the History Channel episode. But Mr. Tsoukalous is out of airtime on this one.
 
Back
Top