I'm not sure if this has ever been shared here before, I apologize if so. A search of "noam chomsky" came up with no threads specific to this video.
Noam makes a pretty solid argument as to why the obvious use of 9/11 to further questionable national security objectives is not evidence that it was planned by the government. We as the public should be well aware by now that tragedies are often used to further political agendas, because people want action and that directly translates into votes for the most vocal. But that doesn't mean they planned the attacks, it just means that (as expected) they exploited them - and, as he explains, so did every other country in the world.
Where was it ever claimed that just because there were questionable national security practices that 9/11 was an inside job?
As far as I remember I have never seen anybody claim that solely and if they did surely that should be cited?
I could post a philosopher just making opinions that it was an inside job so I dont see why the converse is allowed?
After all it wasnt just about nationalism but also about alleged personal goals.
Also, the USA is just one nation inside the alleged "New World Order".
I am writing this from a natural perspective but this thread does seem to be very objective even from that perspective. More like promoting a biased opinion. No offence intended.
Does this thread mean we can now post random opinions from random people? - That is how it comes across. At least to me.