BlueCollarCritic
Member
Not sure if the debunker community still cites as "conspiracy theory" the statement that bisphenol-A (aka BPA) messes with human hormones and is absorbed into the body thru ouch of BA products which include [most] retail register tape (what receipts are printed on) but it’s been proven to be harmful. While I guess you could debate whether or not the harmful effects of BPA were intentional (meaning the companies who produced it did so with full knowledge of its harmful side-affects), I'd like to see you make a logical argument for how its replacement, BPS or Biphenyl-S, is also by accident and not a harmful act willfully down.
Did any of you debunkers claim at some point in the past that the notion that BPA was harmful, and or that it messed with your hormones was just conspiracy theory? There was a time not too long ago when so called conspiracy theorists were warning of the dangers of BPA while the mainstream (like the media) were calling those people tin foil hat wearing nut jobs.
Let’s say BPA was just a freak accident and that it somehow passed al the test/study before being put into production despite its ability to wreak havoc on human hormones. Can you really make the same claim for its replacement? I mean what kind of industry makes this same kind of mistake twice in a row like this without willfully doing it?
You can get the details of the story and study at http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2013/bpa-alternative-alters-hormones
Did any of you debunkers claim at some point in the past that the notion that BPA was harmful, and or that it messed with your hormones was just conspiracy theory? There was a time not too long ago when so called conspiracy theorists were warning of the dangers of BPA while the mainstream (like the media) were calling those people tin foil hat wearing nut jobs.
Let’s say BPA was just a freak accident and that it somehow passed al the test/study before being put into production despite its ability to wreak havoc on human hormones. Can you really make the same claim for its replacement? I mean what kind of industry makes this same kind of mistake twice in a row like this without willfully doing it?
You can get the details of the story and study at http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2013/bpa-alternative-alters-hormones