Banff Chemtrails Billboard Worries David Keith

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
20160825-082507-5eev2.jpg

Billboards promoting the "chemtrail" conspiracy theory are nothing new, but this one got the attention of CBC News, Calgary, in part because it was near the home of geoengineering researcher David Keith

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/chemtrails-david-keith-geoengineering-lookupbanff-1.3733776
The billboard was put up by Jason and Lorna Hardy back in April.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-news-april-9-2016/
And the link does indeed just redirect to the geoengineeringwatch.org home page.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Does anyone else find it slightly ironic that this billboard was funded by the man who runs the Banff airport bus company? :confused:


upload_2016-8-25_17-27-18.png
upload_2016-8-25_17-26-33.png
 
Last edited:

skephu

Senior Member.
Interesting recent email exchange between David Keith and Dane Wigington:
https://t.co/cQsDeCNvZj

Intro

The following is a set of emails between Dane Wigington of Geoengineering Watch and David Keith of Harvard University.


The email addresses have been eliminated to reduce the address scraping for automated spam, but both are easy to find. Other than that, it’s an un-edited transcript.


My hope is that some people who are inclined to take the chemtrails story seriously will look at this exchange with one the leading proponent of these claims and think about what the tone and content says about the credibility of Wigington’s claims.


My views on chemtrails are here.


Please note my final comments about the consequences of spreading this disinformation. I routinely get hate filled emails (see examples) and have twice had threats serious enough to warrant calling the police. Spreading hate has consequences.


David Keith – 1 Sept 2016




From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 7:14 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: You appear ever more desperate David


Hello David, your conduct and your public statements of late seem to reflect an increasing desperation on your part. As I am sure you are aware, the damning video of the exchange between you and I at the AAAS geoengineering conference in 2010 continues to circulate and be duplicated. Though you seem to believe you are immune to being fully exposed to the masses for your lead part in the climate engineering coverup, this is not the case. Soon enough the public will see you for what you are David, an accessory to the catastrophic climate engineering crimes. The truth will be fully exposed, wait and see.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:39 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me?


Was there any way in which it supported the destructive and hateful material you promote?


David


David Keith

Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS); and, Professor of Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 11:20 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


David, what I support is the full disclosure of the truth. What you support, promote, and propagate is the criminal coverup of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare assault which is irreparably harming the climate system, human health, and the planet's ability to support life as a whole. Yes, countless forms of anthropogenic activity have indeed decimated the planet. This being said, the SRM "mitigation" that you have participated in hiding from the public is mathematically the most destructive anthropogenic activity of all. The truth will be exposed David, as will your part in trying to hide it.

Dane

From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:18 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


I asked a simple question. You dodged it. If you support disclosure of the truth, how about starting by answering my question?


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:03 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


David, I did answer your question, but you are simply unwilling (or unable) to acknowledge this (and countless other facts). Whatever your reason or motive for playing the primary part in the criminal deception of the public in regard to the ongoing climate engineering assault, the population is indeed rapidly waking up to who, and what you are. I will personally do everything in my power to continue to accelerate the public awakening, you can count on that David. Do you really believe a fully awakened population will not hold you legally and morally responsible for your actions?


From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:05 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


Where was the answer to “In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me”?


Nothing in your email referred to the specifics of the video clip.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:24 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


I did not realize your question only referred to your statements from the AAAS conference (recorded on film for the world to continue seeing and waking up to). Truly, I can't imagine you are even serious about such a question. In regard to you and your statements on the record, the entire video of the exchange is shocking and damning ( I can't imagine this is not clear to you). Stay tuned, the video of your AAAS statements may soon be shown in a court of law as our legal team pushes forward.

FYI, (in case you want to view the video again)

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qEBZAE0rbs



From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:29 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


Again, an answer that provides more fluff but mothering that answers the question I asked. You say “I can't imagine you are even serious about such a question”. Let’s assume I am serious.


Can you answer?


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:46 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Certainly David, lets start with this statement you made in regard to your proposal of dumping 10 to 20 megatons of alumina nano particles into the atmosphere "its not really a moral hazard, more like free riding on our grandchildren".


As the saying goes,"there are non so blind as those who refuse to see"


Truly, if you can't see the gravity of your statements David, your are indeed willfully blind. I don't believe the public will care why you have played such a part, I believe they will look at your actions from a legal and moral perspective. Time will soon enough tell all. I will continue in my efforts to expose the truth in every peaceful and legal way possible.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:21 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


One of the biggest concern that most folks have is that if geoengineering were implemented to reduce the long-run risks of CO2 emissions it might reduce the incentive to cut emissions since people might (wrongly) believe that the climate change problem was totally solved by solar geoengineering. This concern is often called “moral hazard”, I was arguing, perhaps a bit pedantically, that it should more properly be thought of as “free riding” on distant generations in the sense that if we did solar geoengineering and did not cut emissions our emissions would be passing costs on to them, cost that we did not pay.


As is clear from the context, “moral hazard” and “free riding” are technical terms from economics that I used to discuss possible implications of solar geoengineering—if it was every deployed—on people’s efforts to cut emissions of carbon dioxide.


As Wikipedia puts it: “In economics, moral hazard occurs when one person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks”, seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard.


And, “In economics, the free rider problem occurs when those who benefit from resources, goods, or services do not pay for them, which results in an under-provision of those goods or services”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider_problem


Either way you say it these are legitimate concerns that discussion or implementation of solar geoengineering could reduce efforts to cut CO2 emissions. The distinction between the two is a bit nerdy, but I don't see anything wrong with it.


Can you spell out exactly what you think I am saying that's wrong?


Perhaps the biggest difference in our views the world seems to be that you believe that some large-scale activity is already happening in that it's kept secret. If there was a large-scale secret program it that would be a horrific fact, but how does my nerdy statement about possible implications of solar geoengineering relate to your concerns about some secret program?


You say you want truth -- then stand up for it.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:41 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Yes, David, standing up for the truth, I assure you I will do exactly that until my last breath. The wave of awareness is building by the day, the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror David, or how you can rationalize your part in the cover up of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities that are occurring in our skies.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 11:47 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: RE: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


“The wave of awareness is building by the day, the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror David, or how you can rationalize your part in the cover up of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities that are occurring in our skies.”


I note that this does nothing to respond my email about the about the moral hazard quote you claimed damming, and contains nothing that in any way supports your viewpoint, it simply restates same kind of grand yet vague language about “cover-up” and “deception”.


Is it possible you have nothing more serious to offer?


Suppose our positions were reversed. Suppose I publicly asserted that you were really an malignant alien from Gliese 581g, and that made public statements that I could reasonably expect would encouraged hateful or even violent behavior against you. Yet, when you protested and offered evidence as to your humanity, I refused to acknowledge any arguments but simply repeated innuendo saying “the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror”.


Think about it. Take a look in the mirror.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:58 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Interesting line of rationalization to try and justify the part you have played in the criminal cover up of the climate engineering atrocities, David. Do you think the public will buy it when they fully awaken to what has been done to them and to who lied to hide weather warfare crimes? I think not, we will soon enough find out, the wake up is coming.

Dane

Dane apparently has great difficulties understanding David Keith's question "In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me?"

Instead Dane just keeps repeating "The truth will be exposed, you will be held responsible" etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West TFTRH #13: Professor David Keith – Geoengineering Research and the Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 2
Mick West TFTRH #11: Jim Lee – Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Conspiracies, and Semantics Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 1
Trailblazer Explained: video of concentric circular "chemtrails" (E-3 Sentry AWACS plane, Feb 1 2019) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Ben Geddy Happy to have found this site and Mick thru JRE! Practical Debunking 4
Mick West YouTube adds Encyclopedia Britannica article on Contrails to "Chemtrail" Videos Contrails and Chemtrails 18
FlightMuj Claims of Predictions of Chemtrails in Old Texts Contrails and Chemtrails 3
M Bornong Can Belief in Chemtrails and/or other Conspiracy Theories Lead to Violence? Contrails and Chemtrails 4
skephu Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Chemtrails and the Anti-Vaccine Movement Contrails and Chemtrails 34
MikeG Debunked: Air Force Verifies Chemtrails are Real Contrails and Chemtrails 6
Mick West Quantifying Expert Consensus Against Covert Geoengineering / Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 116
skephu Debunked: Dutch Government Admit Chemtrails Exist Contrails and Chemtrails 7
mrfintoil Debunked: CIA Director admits chemtrails, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection Contrails and Chemtrails 24
C Strange Flickering in Contrail Video Posted in Earlier Thread [Focussing artifacts] Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Trailblazer Russ Tanner accidentally debunks chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Mick West Demythologizing Prince's reference to "Chemtrails" Contrails and Chemtrails 5
ParanoidSkeptic Chemtrails: Experiments on the Public Contrails and Chemtrails 5
MikeC New Zealand Ministry of Environment reply to "chemtrail" query Contrails and Chemtrails 6
F Explained: Video of plane leaving "6 chemtrails, then 2" [Mixed Exhaust and Aerodynamic Contrails] Contrails and Chemtrails 6
Mick West Debunked: Article: "Court Takes Child From Mother After She Mentions Chemtrails At School" Contrails and Chemtrails 92
skephu Chuck Norris on chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Mick West Vice: 'It Was Like a Cult': Leaving the World of Online Conspiracy Theories Escaping The Rabbit Hole 4
skephu Paul Beckwith (climate scientist) on chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 19
JFDee Debunked: Lichens and Moss on Trees Caused by Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Sausalito Spectral analysis of alleged "chemtrails" Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Jay Reynolds Safya Yassin, Missouri ISIS supporter and chemtrails believer arrested for threats Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Trailblazer Chemtrail response from Swiss Federal Office of the Environment Contrails and Chemtrails 3
MikeG Climate Change War Games Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Persistent Trails Survey Shows Chemtrail Believers Only Recently Noticed Persistent Trails Contrails and Chemtrails 32
Dan Page idea: a "Debunked" Stamp Practical Debunking 9
Z 3 military helicopters Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Mick West Debunked: AnonSec's NASA Hack, Global Hawk Hijack, Evidence of Chemtrails [Public Domain Data] General Discussion 32
MikeG Giant Snowflakes [Rimed Dendrites] Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Balance Blatant photoshop deceit of BP refueling tank Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Dan Page Claim: Mobile app uses atmospheric data to prove chemtrails vs contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 12
MikeG Futurism and Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 4
MikeG Accidental Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 7
MikeG Debunked: HAARP Caught in Action Contrails and Chemtrails 28
Ray Von Geezer Ian Simpson / Look-up.org.uk debunks chemtrails & geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 13
skephu Parallel lines of clouds (Virginia Beach) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Ray Von Geezer George Monbiot in the Guardian on "Chemtrails" & Look-up.org.uk Contrails and Chemtrails 26
Dan Page Is Belief in "Chemtrails" Growing? Contrails and Chemtrails 63
P Hi all, I'm new to this forum, so still trying to find my way around. I wanted to comment regarding Contrails and Chemtrails 2
MikeG Common Core and Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Trailblazer Debunked: "Top climate scientist Tim Lenton admits to ongoing geoengineering" Contrails and Chemtrails 23
Mick West Mick West on the Pat Walsh Show, KFBK Sacrament, Talking About Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 7
TEEJ "Airline Pilot" at Climate Engineering Awareness Day - Carlow, Eire, 22nd August 2015 Contrails and Chemtrails 16
Mick West Debunked: Rise In Respiratory Mortality from 4th to 3rd Cause of Death. "Chemtrail Flu" General Discussion 13
Mick West How Rogue Scientist J. Marvin Herndon Disproved the Last Resort of the Chemtrail Theory Contrails and Chemtrails 31
Mick West Fear From Above: Chemtrails vs. Conspiracy Theory in the Bay Area Contrails and Chemtrails 9
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top