911 is political no matter how one slices the apple. . . it cannot be understood without the tangents . . . whether exactly like the Official Story or otherwise . .
Whether or not the events leading up to it were political the cause of the WTC buildings' collapse, whether or not it happened before and whether or not it ever happens again, was pure, logical and explainable physics. Even denying that, the impossibility of enough preparation to demolish even one of the buildings has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Further:
"
Until 9-11, our only experience in bringing down very large buildings was controlled demolition. The highest buildings (apart from broadcast towers) brought down were in the 30 story range. Once the building starts to fall, the physics is going to be the same regardless of the initial cause. So alleged similarities between 9-11 and controlled demolitions prove nothing. You might as well argue that the collapse of Mount St. Helens in 1980 was set off by explosives because it looked just like a landslide caused by explosives.
One thing radically different about 9-11 is that controlled demolitions always set off charges
low in the structure and let the weight of the building do the rest. Nobody ever set off charges
high in a building to pancake the stories beneath. So why resort to a radical and unproven method if you want to bring down the World Trade Center?Probably the most revealing commentary on the controlled demolition theory is
Bringing Down The Houseby Michael Satchell in US News and World Report (June 30, 2003). This article describes the work of Controlled Demolition Inc., far and away the world leaders in controlled demolition, and Mark and Doug Loizeaux, who run it.
Like most Americans, the Loizeauxs were transfixed by the televised scenes of destruction shortly after the first jet struck. But as experts in buildings' vulnerabilities, they knew right away what few Americans realized. "I told Doug immediately that the tower was coming down, and when the second tower was hit, that it would follow," remembers Mark.
Horrified, the Loizeaux brothers watched first responders streaming into the doomed towers and tried frantically, and unsuccessfully, to phone in warnings. In the following days, CDI was called to ground zero to consult on safety and develop plans for demolition and debris removal. What if the twin towers, though badly damaged, had somehow remained standing? Without doubt, the Loizeaux family would have been called upon to bring them down. "Quite simply," says Mark in a rare moment of introspective uncertainty, "I don't know how we would have done it."
So according to the world experts on building demolition:
- It was immediately obvious that the towers were going to fall
- They have no idea how they would have brought down the towers in a controlled demolition.
Of course, you can always claim the Loizeaux brothers were in on the plot. Some sites link to a story about Controlled Demolition later being charged with illegal campaign contributions, which certainly proves something. Or other."