Can you elaborate a little about how you are using it?It's handy for working out timings and viewpoints, especially if you plan on any photography involving landmarks/buildings etc.
Yes it's perfect now! The height is still depending of a lot of atmospheric things, so you have to tweak refraction pressure a bit to have a perfect match, but all in all extremely close.I just fixed some accuracy issues for precisely this type of thing. @ThomasH had a nice photo of the sunrise behind a building where the sun was horizontally off by half a degree and vertically off slightly. The exact DTLDs were known.
The fixes were firstly to account for axial precession -– the earth has tilted half a degree since the reference year. Secondly atmospheric refraction was not applying to buildings.
The precession fix is in. Refraction is mostly done, complete later today. But ENSURE YOU SWITCH REFRACTION ON especially for near the horizon shots. I'm going to make it be in by default.
Also, if anyone has any other photos of a moon or sun behind a large building - at high zoom with exact DTLDs, I'd love to use them to verify accuracy. It now matches @Thomas's image to <0.05°, so visually near perfect.
It is now (2.114.0) on by default.But with refraction off, the height is way off, so maybe it should be on by default?
I don't think the terrain modelling is accurate enough to be very useful for the sunset use case... there seems to be a phantom pyramid out to sea!
No, but I have plans, big plans!Nice work @Mick West - Do you have any plans to correct for the gravitational lensing of the Sun?
/s
Great.It is now (2.114.0) on by default.
And it's quite dramatic at these zooms:
Refraction off (geometric ideal)
View attachment 92456
Refraction on (real life)
View attachment 92458
At the horizon, it's nearly 0.5 degrees. That does not sound like much, but it's about the diameter of the moon.
Wow Cool!