New Feature Sitrec 2.1 New Features

New Feature
How about being able to tell Sitrec a point in a video is a fixed (relatively) point like a star and have the camera match the movement?
 
How about being able to tell Sitrec a point in a video is a fixed (relatively) point like a star and have the camera match the movement?
Do you have an example video where you would use this? I'm not entirely sure what you mean.
 
I guess its just point tracking, but you probably can't do that in js easily.

Another thing i'd like that might be easier is the ability to point and size the FOV of the camera with information given by Astrometry ie:

Center (RA, Dec):(290.159, 13.862)
Center (RA, hms):19h​ 20m​ 38.122s​
Center (Dec, dms):+13° 51' 43.229"
Size:39.1 x 24.8 deg
Radius:23.137 deg
 
You can tell the Bot to point at an RA, Dec. Can you test this does what you expect?
External Quote:

You: point at ra,dec (290.159, 13.862)
Bot: To point the camera at the specified Right Ascension and Declination, I will convert the Right Ascension from degrees to hours.

Right Ascension in hours = 290.159° / 15 = 19.343933 hours

Now, I will issue the API call to point the camera at RA 19.343933 hours and Dec 13.862 degrees.
 
@Mick West I deleted my post above because I though the bug had cleared, but the moon position is definitely playing up in sitrec. Moon position should noticeably change when changing the Time > Day slider, but it doesnt. The position that it appears in the sky seems to change on different loads.
 
@Mick West I deleted my post above because I though the bug had cleared, but the moon position is definitely playing up in sitrec. Moon position should noticeably change when changing the Time > Day slider, but it doesnt. The position that it appears in the sky seems to change on different loads.
Yeah, I was just looking at that. The problem started when I tried to make the moon visible in the daytime. It's first on my list to fix
 
Bug: Satellites not appearing in look view:

https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?cu...st-2.amazonaws.com/15857/x/20250920_120516.js
1758370070742.png
 
Bug: Satellites not appearing in look view:
The flaring satellites are all below the horizon.

I think the others (that are in sunlight) are just too far away (1,600 miles)
Actually, none of the satellites in sunlight are visible; they are all below the horizon.
2025-09-20_09-51-25.jpg



2025-09-20_09-52-20.jpg
 
Last edited:
Should this Starlink train be visible on Sitrec or are the TLEs not there for recent launch trains?
Hmm, interesting, I just copied and past this into the assistant while in Starlink mode

Time: 9.25.25: 5:49am mountain time
Location: Cheyenne, WY
(I had to do it twice, sometimes it forgets to do what it said it was going to)
Zoomed out a bit, and there was the train:
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?cu...ct Cheyenne_ WY _ Starlink/20250926_132442.js
2025-09-26_06-16-48.jpg

2025-09-26_06-18-15.jpg


But, when I do "Load LEO Satellites for Date", the train is missing:
2025-09-26_06-19-58.jpg
2025-09-26_06-19-50.jpg


The issue seems to be that the Starlink setup, by default, loads
https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/supplemental/sup-gp.php?FILE=starlink&FORMAT=tle

But the historical data comes from space-track.org, which might be lagging a bit in adding these.

The solution would be to add an option to load the current Starlink file. BRB.
 
  • Left Drag is like dragging the world around. The camera is what actually moves.
  • Right Drag tilts the viewpoint without moving the camera
Left drag does the same as Right Drag as far as I can tell

I just want to move the camera with keyboard keys like WASD and up and down
 
When you rotate the camera the labels for planets etc move around a lot, away from the the dots they represent.

1758900539998.png


to

1758900549585.png
 
  • Left Drag is like dragging the world around. The camera is what actually moves.
  • Right Drag tilts the viewpoint without moving the camera
Left drag does the same as Right Drag as far as I can tell
They look the same when you are overhead at a medium altitude, but they are actually very different (unless there's a bug)

 
Oh you are talking about the camera showing the view, I want to move the camera that is placed in scene.
 
I've noticed recently that if I share a Sitrec link with a video, while the video is downloading Sitrec shows a view that isn't what it ends up showing when the full thing loads, this might confuse some people. Perhaps a loading screen might be appropriate..
 
Does sitrec have a limit on polygon draw distance, does it only draw polygons that are within tile radius?
 
Does sitrec have a limit on polygon draw distance, does it only draw polygons that are within tile radius?
I have a polygon for that Olympiaturm tower in Munich which is rendering in Sitrec even though it's outside the tile distance. It does make them look like they're floating in the air though. Maybe if the distance is really far it's best to reduce the zoom level a little bit? Or move the center of the terrain tiles in the direction of the line of sight a bit.

zoom 15, 6 tiles:
Screenshot 2025-10-04 at 01.54.55.png


zoom 12, 6 tiles:
Screenshot 2025-10-04 at 01.55.07.png

(https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?cu...panoramacam_20251003T2040Z/20251003_235425.js)
 
Does sitrec have a limit on polygon draw distance, does it only draw polygons that are within tile radius?
It does not have a draw limit, but if it's outside of a tile then it's going to be at the wrong elevation, because they are relative to the ground, and there is no ground.
 
I've noticed recently that if I share a Sitrec link with a video, while the video is downloading Sitrec shows a view that isn't what it ends up showing when the full thing loads, this might confuse some people. Perhaps a loading screen might be appropriate..
Yeah, that's probably something I notice less, as I have very fast internet. Can you share a link that demonstrates this?
 
Back
Top