Can you not see the flaw in that argument? Obviously funding came from 'somewhere', but you seemed to think it was all investigated, documented and known. No big deal. You were mistaken, end of story No more stupid than what you were asking, (which is why I turned the tables) i.e. To be honest that doesn't make sense on a number of levels as clearly in order for anything to collapse, it must lose its structural integrity, whether it be by fire, explosives or being washed away in a flood. There could be a number of reasons, it would be pure speculation. The collapse zone was established around midday, well before any fires were even officially reported. Maybe he was just told to do it. Maybe it was a safety precaution as the other buildings had already collapsed Maybe he knew it was going to be demolished What is clear is there are gaping holes in the OS and the public should know the truth but I am well aware there are many on here who think it presumptious that us mere 'people' should presume to be audatious enough as to expect to be kept informed when clearly the Govt knows best and decides that we should not be trusted to know other than what they feed us.