Can you not see the flaw in that argument? Obviously funding came from 'somewhere', but you seemed to think it was all investigated, documented and known.The funding came from various sources, mainly from fundraising. Read comprehension FTW!
No big deal. You were mistaken, end of storyI'd look into the book The 9/11 Project: A Journalist's Perspective which has some great information regarding the funding. I'll try to get that information to you before the week is up.
No more stupid than what you were asking, (which is why I turned the tables) i.e.That's just a stupid thing to ask. Can you prove Jesus wasn't a velociraptor?
To be honest that doesn't make sense on a number of levels as clearly in order for anything to collapse, it must lose its structural integrity, whether it be by fire, explosives or being washed away in a flood.Also, my question about Nigro remains that you refuse to answer; how did he know the building would collapse due to anything else besides the loss of its structural integrity?
There could be a number of reasons, it would be pure speculation. The collapse zone was established around midday, well before any fires were even officially reported.So, the FDNY was wrong in their assessment of WTC7 on the day of 9/11? Why would they lie? And how is my question a strawman argument? All I'm asking is why did Nigro establish the collapse zone around WTC7?
Maybe he was just told to do it.
Maybe it was a safety precaution as the other buildings had already collapsed
Maybe he knew it was going to be demolished
What is clear is there are gaping holes in the OS and the public should know the truth but I am well aware there are many on here who think it presumptious that us mere 'people' should presume to be audatious enough as to expect to be kept informed when clearly the Govt knows best and decides that we should not be trusted to know other than what they feed us.