Curious if this is accurate: It seems to me that people shouldn't even have to debate the facts that these theories and simulations are based on. Either it had shear studs or it didn't. And NIST was being paid to find and report the facts, not play games with: "Studs were not indicated on the design drawings for many of the core girders." vs. "...for the girders." Or is Griffin distorting the truth? Seems unlikely.