In 2012 as part of a volunteer for Minnesota MUFON, I was asked to look at a video and interpret it. I've done this many times, and usually, could find a reasonable explanation, or at least, not too implausible. This particular example has had...
I had my AI team spend about 30 minutes on this topic, and it gave this reasonable overview of the evidence, with this conclusion:
Executive conclusion
The publicly available evidence establishes that some fragmented .30-caliber projectile...
Hello. I'm a 74 year old tech entrepreneur based in Minnesota. Many years ago I used to do photo analysis for Minnesota MUFON, except they got mad at me because I could never confirm a still or video sequence as truly unexplainable. There was...
Start a new thread in the UFO forum. Attach the PDF, but also add a summary of the key points of evidence and analysis in your post. See: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/metabunks-link-policy.5158/
Hello. I'm a 74 year old tech entrepreneur based in Minnesota. Many years ago I used to do photo analysis for Minnesota MUFON, except they got mad at me because I could never confirm a still or video sequence as truly unexplainable. There was...
Snips of the two images from "The story behind a famous photo of an ejection from a RAF Lightning interceptor", Aviation Geek Club website,
07 August 2018, Dario Leone...
I have updated Skywatcher UAP identification guide to include DOW-UAP-PR030
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/dow-uap-pr030-shapeshifting-object-thats-really-two-small-objects.15010
I think that might be confounded by motion blur and the stabilization. If there's motion blur in the direction of on-screen motion, but that motion is hidden by the stabilization, then it might create more of a shape change than actually existed.
The entire nomenclature of UFOlogy is obfuscatory. 'biologics' might be aliens. 'drones' might be aliens. 'orbs' might be aliens. We have 'tic tacs' that might be aliens. Heck....even frikin 'asteroids' now might be aliens.
Its all borrowing...
You remind me of my favorite line from the TV show "(not) Finding Bigfoot": "Sounds squatchy" for a nighttime shriek in the woods ...as if they actually know what sounds their postulated Sasquatch would make.
It's interesting that what seems like a neutral question of physics has become (like everything) deeply polarised.
Some push back to the "there must be an exit wound" here...