Latest activity

I used 'aliens' tout court just to simplify. Add in to the mix any non-mundane cause you prefer, from human-made physics-defying crafts to psychic projections or Matrix glitches (both in the same general ballpark with aliens for what concerns...

Origin of the rumor? The phrase "never seen before" sounds very Trump-like, but if that's the source it might be best not to put too much confidence in it. But ...he does tend to blurt out statements without bothering to check if the information...

Origin of the rumor? The phrase "never seen before" sounds very Trump-like, but if that's the source it might be best not to put too much confidence in it. But ...he does tend to blurt out statements without bothering to check if the information...

Which is why you need to have multiple viewing points miles apart so that multiple simultaneous recordings can be made. Triangulation would reveal if the orbs were nearby or more likely all in orbit. But these folks will never allow such a thing...

It demonstrates how vague the claim is, though.

Origin of the rumor? The phrase "never seen before" sounds very Trump-like, but if that's the source it might be best not to put too much confidence in it. But ...he does tend to blurt out statements without bothering to check if the information...

I think the flock of birds explanation is the most likely in Kenneth Arnold's case - whether geese or pelicans. This opinion has only been strengthened by the recently released batch of UAP evidence from the US, which turns out to be mostly...

I do, yes. With the benefit of doubt.

Some quotes from Dini's presentation : We are clearly dealing with physical phenomena, physical phenomena you can observe and record. one of the characteristics, beside the extraordinary accelerations observed in several cases, is objects...

Actually the explanation put forward by my colleague James Easton many years ago was that he saw pelicans, and it made good sense. So either Shermer mis-remembered what Easton said, or you mis-remembered what Shermer said.

Agreed! Nor do I. I do think that I have to acknowledge that error is possible, and that since we know human error occurs and don;t know if aliens or time travelers or being from other dimensions, human error is more likely, even if unproven...

Some quotes from Dini's presentation : We are clearly dealing with physical phenomena, physical phenomena you can observe and record. one of the characteristics, beside the extraordinary accelerations observed in several cases, is objects...

Do you mean the range of their imaginary psychic abilities?

The platforms don't like debunkers. Downvote and flag all you want but if the bunk sells then it gets promoted by the algorithm irrespective of whether it is AI slop or human garbage.