Latest activity

This, and the thought that science only makes advances when it proposes things that have not been considered or discovered before, so we should always consider the existence and presence of NHI or aliens. The common analogy is that people didn't...

The platforms don't like debunkers. Downvote and flag all you want but if the bunk sells then it gets promoted by the algorithm irrespective of whether it is AI slop or human garbage.

The real question is, "who promised you these would be significant? wouldn't it be best to stop listening to these people?"

The platforms don't like debunkers. Downvote and flag all you want but if the bunk sells then it gets promoted by the algorithm irrespective of whether it is AI slop or human garbage.

The platforms don't like debunkers. Downvote and flag all you want but if the bunk sells then it gets promoted by the algorithm irrespective of whether it is AI slop or human garbage.

This happens with many cases, any eyewitness testimony alone is scientifically useless for drawing conclusions. I agree with this, I just don't see how this shows that every time a pilot describes something that seems to be weird (excluding...

I have no idea what they saw. But all we have is the unsupported testimony of witnesses as to what they saw* and no way of evaluating which bits of that testimony are accurate, if any, and which are in error, if any. I'd be comfortable with...

As noted in the old comment I linked to, there have been reports that looked into this, including Hynek's 1978 report. His conclusion, which seems consistent with the many examples we have discussed here and elsewhere, is that pilots are good at...

I have no idea what they saw. But all we have is the unsupported testimony of witnesses as to what they saw* and no way of evaluating which bits of that testimony are accurate, if any, and which are in error, if any. I'd be comfortable with...

So the person who messaged me regarding this has now put it on their YouTube. It was Dan Zetterstrom from the "What it means to be human" podcast. Intro is at 2m47s: Source: https://youtu.be/NkmX7Yp3tlA?t=167 Debunk is at the 1h06m mark...

I have no idea what they saw. But all we have is the unsupported testimony of witnesses as to what they saw* and no way of evaluating which bits of that testimony are accurate, if any, and which are in error, if any. I'd be comfortable with...

Let's consider a scenario in which you and I might find ourselves. Drive down the road at 65 miles an hour. Automatic transmission, no need to watch all the dials and pressure gauges and altimeters one might find in a plane's cockpit -...

So the person who messaged me regarding this has now put it on their YouTube. It was Dan Zetterstrom from the "What it means to be human" podcast. Intro is at 2m47s: Source: https://youtu.be/NkmX7Yp3tlA?t=167 Debunk is at the 1h06m mark...

Who was aware of what cases would be released before they were released? Are any of them proud of the outcome? Are any even satisfied?

Let's consider a scenario in which you and I might find ourselves. Drive down the road at 65 miles an hour. Automatic transmission, no need to watch all the dials and pressure gauges and altimeters one might find in a plane's cockpit -...