Exactly.
We looked at fairies and the laws of nature and said:
These don't work together, fairies don't exist.
They look at UFOs and the laws of nature and say:
These don't work together, the NHIs must know more than we do.
Why?
@jarlrmai I agree that the airliner candidates dont seem to fit. I added some buildings to the stitch to try and get a better line of sight to the light, and after scrubbing the video back and forth I'm not sure that it even is a plane. It could...
But this can be said of anything. For example, no photos or videos of fairies that we know of, what can you deduce from that? Is this fact evidence for or against the existence of fairies?
This zooming in on bright lights in poor quality pixelated digital videos trying to see detail that isnt there is not new. It was done with Kumburgaz video when people said they could see alien heads through the spaceship's hatch...
A video from "Magic" Mike Battista? He's got history. He made the same psionic/psyonic claims - with Kryzak as co-conspirator too - and pushed by Ross Coultard as the cherry on top - last year:
Source...
To me it looks like it could bee nothing more than a bright light (e.g. a garden or driveway light) that's seen through a grubby and/or rain on the window. The movement of the "being" could be movement of trees/bushes in front of the light, due...
It looks as if it's a bright light photographed through a glass bowl of water, which ripples somewhat. At least, that's the way I would try to recreate it! That, I suppose, would make it an "inter-medium" object. :)
Hello, indeed, I use Metabunk quite a lot, which is in itself considered an heresy by true believers. I find the debates here very useful, and all who follow my work know that my first advice when a "groundbreaking" UFO video arises is to check...
Yes, indeed. Multiple witnesses can be interviewed separately, and hopefully before they've had much opportunity to discuss the case with one another. Again, the main point isn't to determine whether someone is lying, but to see whether different...
I kind of agree. Witnesses are wasting their time without sharing evidence - skeptics tend to become convinced that a claim is true whenever they are shown evidence that supports the claim. People can claim anything, and using words to describe...
I think you can have corroborating witness testimony, and analyze shapes reported, places seen, etc. —as has been done before, but at the end of the day, what absolute conclusions can one draw from that? If visual evidence comes forward that...
I kind of agree. Witnesses are wasting their time without sharing evidence - skeptics tend to become convinced that a claim is true whenever they are shown evidence that supports the claim. People can claim anything, and using words to describe...
This zooming in on bright lights in poor quality pixelated digital videos trying to see detail that isnt there is not new. It was done with Kumburgaz video when people said they could see alien heads through the spaceship's hatch...
Exactly.
We looked at fairies and the laws of nature and said:
These don't work together, fairies don't exist.
They look at UFOs and the laws of nature and say:
These don't work together, the NHIs must know more than we do.
Why?