Latest activity
-
Eburacum replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.GEIPAN are not infallible; their investigators are often too quick to declare something anomalous. There are four photos from this incident; none of them show a triangle. And the detail of the dog's illness seems entirely irrelevant. The fact... -
Fritzkquzerk reacted to Harabeck's post in the thread Claims of Advanced Tech Recovered from UFOs with
Like.
He may not be doing it for profit. Maybe he genuinely thinks he's advocating for an important topic. Or it's fun. Or whatever. -
Fritzkquzerk reacted to NorCal Dave's post in the thread Claims of Advanced Tech Recovered from UFOs with Like.
I don't want to get all off topic here, but some of TTSAs shenanigans, like the CRADA with the Army give fuel to the UFO angle with McCasland. I don't think Elizondo was ever CIA to my knowledge and I'm not sure which piece of junk he...
-
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.As I said now countless times, the way AARO and NASA define it. If nothing ever comes out of it worth studying, as I stated before, that would just expand the LIZ a bit further. Do I have to change my mind regarding the “worth studying” subject...
-
When it's got to the point this man is asking for evidence Source: https://x.com/Tsoukalos/status/2064492450576511146?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet -
jarlrmai replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.How do you define the term "anomalies" in this context? -
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.None. It's an open hypothesis. If we already had the data to prove or disprove it, it wouldn't be classified as “unidentified clutter” in the first place. I guess we have to agree to disagree on whether it’s worth studying anomalies or not.
-
jarlrmai replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.What indication do you have that there are new physics in any of this?
-
Gary C reacted to Andreas's post in the thread Transients in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey with Like.
One aspect of Busko's findings that I find more interesting than the coma analysis itself is the extreme clustering. If I understand the data correctly, all 11 candidates occur within a narrow time window (roughly 1949–1953) and in just two small... -
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.No, but nor do I think humans have discovered all physics.
-
jarlrmai replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.You think there are ghouls?
-
Chief Gleeby reacted to Fritzkquzerk's post in the thread June 2026 US Capitol UAP Press Conference with David Grusch with
Funny.
Yeah, but Puma Punku was clearly built using electromagnetic levitation. That's as clear as day. :D -
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread War.gov/UFO - Department of War Releases UAP Files - 2026 Release 1.Because I want the sentient ghouls masquerading as flying saucers.
-
Fritzkquzerk reacted to Chief Gleeby's post in the thread June 2026 US Capitol UAP Press Conference with David Grusch with Like.
Thought this was worth mentioning as I never thought I'd see the day! Even Giorgio A. Tsoukalos (Mr. Ancient Aliens himself!) is getting sick of the lack of solid evidence the disclosure movement is producing! (The Tweet) He still thinks...
-
Fritzkquzerk replied to the thread June 2026 US Capitol UAP Press Conference with David Grusch.Yeah, but Puma Punku was clearly built using electromagnetic levitation. That's as clear as day. :D
