Latest activity

Angeles National Forest this morning.

I am adding the "International Center for 9/11 Justice"'s Form 990EZ for fiscal year 2024, which I found on candid.org (which gives their "Subject area" as "Religion" ^^) Total Revenues are US$ 136,994, that's up from 92,031 in 2023, or +49%...

The "random garbage" is what people who think they've seen something anomalous have dropped *onto* AARO. Blame the source, not the mediator.

And even the more or less scientific research institutes and initiatives established by ufologists themselves have so far produced nothing that would amount to significant evidence for exotic events. Time and again, it all boils down to hearsay...

The "random garbage" is what people who think they've seen something anomalous have dropped *onto* AARO. Blame the source, not the mediator.

1. Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1tsir7c/someone_have_an_explanation_or_some_opinions/ Time:8/21/24 at 4:02am Location: Pacific ocean just off coast of Long Beach. I know what satellites and planes look like, this wasn't...

Are you seriously suggesting that experience gained from hundreds and hundreds of previous investigations is "an emotional stance"?

I think the other more fundamental problem with that scenario is basic ownership. IF Mellon did in fact know about some form of advanced technology, how would he have any ability to bring it to market? Presumably, whatever this supposed...

Survey left out "Lucky"

If Mellon and co. are using NHI UFO's as a stalking horse for outing classified terrestrial tech, they have had no success with this either. How long do we have to wait?

I think it's very much case-by-case. We know a lot of old data was simply not preserved. We see some cases, like Aguadilla, where they seem to just use the on-screen data. But I think that at the very least they will have on-screen data for most...

Nor do I. But you have not drawn a distinction between the two. Do you assume (wrongly) that anomalies must be things of interest? A thing in the LIZ is anomalous, i.e. we don't know what it is. A thing described verbally by a witness may be...

After eighty years of disappointment, the null hypothesis seems like a reasonable assumption.

What good does it do to guess (and hope?) that videos and documents we don't even know exist would potentially show something anomalous? We have the declassified material to study, and skeptics have already done a great job analyzing most of...

It's possible the full picture is birds, balloons, other people's drones, misunderstandings of visible spectrum imagery of intense IR sources etc. etc. If this is the case, we still learn something from working out what is being seen/ detected/...