Latest activity

Note: he has done both in the past -- space aliens in CE3K and ET, and interdimensional flying saucer and grey-alien-type creature in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skul.

While I agree, I can't help thinking there's the person operating the camera and their equipment to consider as well. Which leans me further to it being video of a training exercise and even less important that someone on camera isn't fully suited.

I made some videos to help compare the background motion frame by frame before / after the zip off. I used the frames from the 25% slowed down portion as suggested above. Here I've compared the frames just prior to the zip off to get a baseline...

This video demonstrates an objection to the camera-motion hypothesis posited by Marik von Rennenkampff, on X. He notes that the camera-relative trajectory of the object changes and suggests that this implies it is independent of the camera...

@Curiousfi could it have been a rectangular contrail? (short for condensation trail) Rectangular contrail photo from 2022 Reddit thread: This 2014 Metabunk thread by @Mick West discusses a news article about a rectangular contrail spotted in...

But not to clean the house.

This thread by @Adriaan is reminiscent of another recent thread by @nightsky74. Both are photos of angularly small objects, not noticed at the time. Object resolution is too low to positively identify. Such an object may range from large and...

Instances of "I didn't see it at the time, only when I looked at the pictures later" pop up regularly. I think the issue is usually that the photographers eyes were focused on something very far away. So the insect quickly passing by, only feet...

Possibly as it's just a random flash from below his local horizon and the sound does not appear to reach his location during this video segment?

Or if you think about graphing the change in speed over time, an "instantaneous acceleration" would have undefined slope, due to being perfectly vertical.

This video demonstrates an objection to the camera-motion hypothesis posited by Marik von Rennenkampff, on X. He notes that the camera-relative trajectory of the object changes and suggests that this implies it is independent of the camera...

Blue Origin New Glenn rocket explodes on launchpad in the background on a Ring camera, at the exact moment that a pizza is being delivered. And the driver doesn't seem to notice or care. Source: x.com/huntermanley/status/2060178188462850358

Instances of "I didn't see it at the time, only when I looked at the pictures later" pop up regularly. I think the issue is usually that the photographers eyes were focused on something very far away. So the insect quickly passing by, only feet...

This thread by @Adriaan is reminiscent of another recent thread by @nightsky74. Both are photos of angularly small objects, not noticed at the time. Object resolution is too low to positively identify. Such an object may range from large and...