Iran released another video, this time claiming to be of an F-15, and the footage appears to be from the same type of system that recorded the F-35. Once again, the video cuts off abruptly, likely because in the last few frames, we see the...
Sitrec has improved quite a bit since this case started. In particular, with the addition of 3D buildings (logged-in users only). I know a lot of the original work was done in Google Earth, as it had those buildings. There probably isn't much...
News in the CPH case.
The witness who first raised the alarm has given an interview to a newspaper. She has been questioned several times by the police, who brought in "experts" to analyze her video, and the conclusion is that it's a plane, and...
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=1/Barksdale AFB March 2026 Drones/20260320_213744.js
It's pretty flat around there, so you can see plane lights that are a long way off, and they look like they are hovering and sometimes moving left and...
I find it hard to believe that a single huge structure such as described (1) existed at all, and (2) was deliberately flown over Phoenix, a huge, busy metropolitan area where even a largish kite would certainly be a traffic hazard if it came...
Iran released another video, this time claiming to be of an F-15, and the footage appears to be from the same type of system that recorded the F-35. Once again, the video cuts off abruptly, likely because in the last few frames, we see the...
I find it hard to believe that a single huge structure such as described (1) existed at all, and (2) was deliberately flown over Phoenix, a huge, busy metropolitan area where even a largish kite would certainly be a traffic hazard if it came...
Go back to post #79. Prolific Varginha researcher and native Portuguese speaker @BoulderRiver gives a breakdown of it. He and @Gaspa are the ones to ask.
Go back to post #79. Prolific Varginha researcher and native Portuguese speaker @BoulderRiver gives a breakdown of it. He and @Gaspa are the ones to ask.
hello everyone! i go by neon and i am currently studying photography from my bfa, so not well versed in a lot of technology know-how.
i had found this site after the recent threads regarding chris bledsoe's prophecy and wanted to ask a few...
I find it hard to believe that a single huge structure such as described (1) existed at all, and (2) was deliberately flown over Phoenix, a huge, busy metropolitan area where even a largish kite would certainly be a traffic hazard if it came...
Is it possible that lights in the sky were not physically connected to a single structure, but that witnesses perceived them as being lights on a single object? In the thread "Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer" Mick West raised...
Is it possible that lights in the sky were not physically connected to a single structure, but that witnesses perceived them as being lights on a single object? In the thread "Major UFO experiences are specific to the observer" Mick West raised...
That's not *nuance*, that's *wrong*. She misspoke, that's clear (which is not an indicator of stupidity, given that she was under stress - so a retraction of your false assertion above would be appreciated, I did not make the suggestion you think...