WikiSpooks

[AluminumTheory]

It seems that the CTs have grown tired to trying to inject their own nonsense into Wikipedia pages, so they have decided to make their own instead.


https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Main_Page


I wonder how successful this will become.

 

[Mick West]

Their editorial policy reveals the main flaw in conspiracy thinking:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/WikiSpooks:About

WikiSpooks editorial policy summary

1. The veracity and accuracy of official announcements, documents, press releases etc should be treated as inversely proportional to the Power, Wealth, Statutory (or other claimed) Authority, in 'current Establishment hierarchies of their source.
2. Any such information should be assumed to be in furtherance of a hidden - if more or less obvious - agenda and thus designed to mislead rather than to inform.
3. Reputation, Position, Rank, Place etc., in Establishment hierarchies and protocols (both current and historical) should be treated as pretentious conceits serving Establishment agendas (hidden or otherwise) and thus deserving of ridicule, satire and other forms of literary attack.

i.e. "believe the opposite of anything official sounding."

This is why people get mentally stuck in believing things like 9/11 controlled demolition. They HAVE to believe it, because the official story says it is not true.

 

[AluminumTheory]

Based on their editorial policy, it doesn't seem like they're aiming for legitimate research. Inversely assigning credibility based on financial status and power is absurd, and is quite frankly no better than doing the exact opposite. Based on that policy, I guess a guy living in a van connecting to the internet via free wifi is a more credible source than the New York Times. I wonder where Alex Jones and his Infowars would fit in to all of this. Or even, Glenn Beck's 'The Blaze'. Granted, they don't exactly have alot of power. But they obviously have alot of money to run their respective sites.