As far as i have come i boil this to the following, and this is something that can be disproved, i have said before and will say it again, i will not paste every single document,simulation or equation when these have taken me months to go through. What i will say is that the below can be tested and whether one does not like my conclusions, they are based on the "facts" presented by official sources
The passport can't have been in the cockpit and exited undamaged
It cannot have been in the 10b seat loose or in a jacket and exited undamagedt
It could be in a cabin in 10b inside a case, but then it cannot have been soaked in fuel
It cannot have exited the east side of the tower
It can have exited the west side but would have to land in the plaza or on wtc 4 roof, after lateral ejection there is only now, the wind to carry it further and that distance will not be enough to take it streets away
If it was found in the Plaza it was carried around for some time
It can, if in a bag, or cabin in the seat area, have gone forwards and ended up on the streets where a seat cushion is photographed but not soaked in fuel
It did contain an invalid visa that no one noticed
It did contain forged stamps that match none of the huge list of forgeries known and only matched to Al qaeda forgeries
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/archive/hearing7/9-11Commission_Hearing_2004-01-26.htm
From the mid 1970s when terrorists began to launch attacks in the Middle East and Europe, intelligence and border authorities knew that terrorists used forged or altered travel documents. By the 1980s the U.S. government had developed a Red Book used to guide and train consular, immigration and customs officers throughout the world on spotting terrorists. It included photographs of altered or stolen passports and false travel stamps also known as cachets used by terrorists.
Passport found on different occasions
The passport was handled by NYPD,JTTF,FBI,INS and probably the Airline
No agency knew of the forgeries, this was discovered in time for the 9/11 report, the forensic examiner at the FBI could not id any forgeries that matched any previously known
The other "surviving" artefacts that have been presented are, not from in the plane,not from the same location in the plane,not undamaged at all even when they were known to be in wallets etc. Not from the same type of crash, not passed through the towers, not in existence except in a story
The other "Undamaged" item is a far more important item but there is no claim to either its condition nor to why it was not handed in too-the passenger itinerary
This naturally will be disputed but that requires disproving, which can be done if you wish to spend the time going through the simulations-I suggest that using decent ones is best rather than provably false ones. And the papers detailing the speed of impact and the deformation/destruction
To go further requires
Identify if soaked meant damp/smelled/moist
Identify if the officer was a plain clothes or had identifiers of his authority
Identify if Suqami actually had baggage to have put his passport in
Identify exact times for cordoned areas and abandoned areas
Identify number of times and sources passport was found
This is going to be achieved by detailed analysis of footage, a FOIA request to FBI/JTTF/NYPD as well as rerunning through FAA details and 9/11 report to see if there is detail that says Suqami had a bag. Also check all media sources for written and video, of when the passport was allegedly found
If the passport is found to have been soaked as is suggested then this will need a examination of the fuel and its accelration to catch up with a bagged object in quantity to soak through that and soak the passport. Then identify how little is required to bleed stamps on a passport (none where affected)
If the cop was not in uniform, the bag cannot allow enough fuel through and the tiniest amount causes a bleed of the stamps, if suqami had no bag, and areas were cordoned for a long period prior to passport being handed in, any of these add huge credence to conspiracy theory and some downright prove it.
I am in the process of doing what needs to be done to get these answers
So as it stands it is not actually UNLIKELY the passport was planted in fact it has a reasonable chance of having been the case.
This is self evident, if i had said a missile hit the towers you could outright destroy that theory, this is not so clear cut otherwise where was that proof that rebutted everything?
So i will be looking for the other items of information, you will all dispute what i have said but i think that we will be wasting the thread rehashing it so feel free to do so, i think these final points will be a major factor so ill be back when i can find the answers to these points