Thanks for the education

[Balance]

I just want to convey my gratitude to all for what I've learnt so far.

Some of you are probably very old hands at it, but I literally jumped for joy a minute ago as I put into practice what I've learnt.

Case in point, Max Bliss post https://www.facebook.com/mrmaxbliss...comment_id=29700329&offset=0&total_comments=1

I fired up FR24 and replayed the time and locations given and clicked on the accused aircraft. My word, he's right, look at that unusual flight path. I then googled it's callsign and lo and behold. http://www.planespotters.net/Production_List/Airbus/A350/004,F-WZNW-Airbus-Industrie.php

Does Max know this site exists, he could learn something, even from a rookie like me

Cheers everyone, keep up the good work!

 

[Balance]

umm, can't seem to edit the above. I wanted to change "callsign" to "registraion".

 

[Hama Neggs]

I just want to convey my gratitude to all for what I've learnt so far.

Some of you are probably very old hands at it, but I literally jumped for joy a minute ago as I put into practice what I've learnt.

Case in point, Max Bliss post https://www.facebook.com/mrmaxbliss...comment_id=29700329&offset=0&total_comments=1

I fired up FR24 and replayed the time and locations given and clicked on the accused aircraft. My word, he's right, look at that unusual flight path. I then googled it's callsign and lo and behold. http://www.planespotters.net/Production_List/Airbus/A350/004,F-WZNW-Airbus-Industrie.php

Does Max know this site exists, he could learn something, even from a rookie like me

Cheers everyone, keep up the good work!

People like Max only "research" until they find the answer they want to find. Good example is Max' recent showing of an older book with pictures showing the sky with no contrails. ONE BOOK! Does he look at many books to confirm his assertion? No, of course not. He found the "proof" he wanted to find.

 

[Balance]

People like Max only "research" until they find the answer they want to find.

Was sort of my point, as someone that's only been researching chemtrails this year, it was a snip (thanks mainly from what I've learnt here at MB and CS) to realise Max's deceit just by looking up the registration details.

Good example is Max' recent showing of an older book with pictures showing the sky with no contrails.

Yep, I noticed that too and made a sarcastic comment here https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...ars-of-books-on-clouds.3201/page-2#post-95825

 

[Soulfly]

People like Max only "research" until they find the answer they want to find. Good example is Max' recent showing of an older book with pictures showing the sky with no contrails. ONE BOOK! Does he look at many books to confirm his assertion? No, of course not. He found the "proof" he wanted to find.

The ole, sample the Ocean with a glass and declare whales don't exist.

 

[WeedWhacker]

Good example is Max' recent showing of an older book with pictures showing the sky with no contrails. ONE BOOK!

Yes, and it seemed to me from a casual viewing of that video, most of the photos had very little sky in them! The photos were composed to highlight the buildings and landscapes, and the sky was primarily cropped at the top. "Texas Sharpshooter" fallacy.

 

[Hama Neggs]

The ole, sample the Ocean with a glass and declare whales don't exist.

There seems to be no good way to get their followers to understand the deceitful methods in play. What the chemtrail movement leaders say SOUNDS reasonable, on the surface, and the followers will never look beyond the surface. After all, who is willing to do the amount of research we do here? Not many.

PS: You have to get the followers to understand just how dishonest their leaders are. The cognitive distance is just too great. They just can't get to the reality of the situation from where they are.