Psionics at Contact in the Desert

flarkey

Senior Member.
Staff member
Carl Crusher has posted a long video recorded at the recent Contact in the Desert conference in Palm Springs. They claim the video shows them summoning orbs with their minds. This is the video ...

Source: https://youtu.be/4zvMqWA6eLo?si=KYImANYH5vn9lFmv


A few days ago I was contacted by someone (I'll protect their anonymity) who was invited to attend the event and witness the summoning of the orbs, but even they seemed a little skeptical and suspected that they were just seeing Starlink... They said...

Hey man! If I send you a video can you take a look at it? Went out with the psionic guys at CITD last night and got what they called 'hits'. Very starlink-looking but didn't have any signal to check.

this is the video they sent me...



The video includes metadata of the location and exact time. The person who contacted me suggested that it was just a 'dot of light' or an orb, but if you look closely there are two orbs that appear at the same point in the sky, just to the left of Cassiopeia.

33.63320° N, 116.40570° W (Google Maps)
30 May 2026 0100:21 PDT

I've checked this in Sitrec and using the location & time & satellite orbital data for that moment we can see that there would have been two starlink satellites flaring in that exact part of the sky.

62459.png


https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=15857/CITD 2026 by Anonymous Attendee/20260607_084932.js

Now that we have the full video of the event from the Psionics guys maybe we can sync some of the other clips and check if indeed they summoned orbs, or did they just see Starlink.
 
Last edited:
What a silly show.
Did any of the orb "summoners" have Micks new Starlink predictor app on their smartphone?
Will the "summoners" allow anyone WITH that app on their phone to take part in an event like this? Or will they be banned from attending?
And they couldn't even bother to go out far enough away from the city lights to stage their event? To make it all seem more covert and secretish.
 
What a silly show.
Did any of the orb "summoners" have Micks new Starlink predictor app on their smartphone?
Will the "summoners" allow anyone WITH that app on their phone to take part in an event like this? Or will they be banned from attending?
And they couldn't even bother to go out far enough away from the city lights to stage their event? To make it all seem more covert and secretish.

I think their logic is that we cant prove that they are all Starlink or satellites, or that they don't all show up on their tracking apps, therefore they could possibly potentially still be NHI that have been telepathically summoned.

I think that's a bit of a stretch.
 
I think their logic is that we cant prove that they are all Starlink or satellites, or that they don't all show up on their tracking apps, therefore they could possibly potentially still be NHI that have been telepathically summoned.
Yes, that's been my experience. They know that SHF exist, but continue to think they are summoning things.
 
It's also funny that one of the reasons they dismissed the 1st location was cars potentially interfering, yet they drove their truck up to the eventual viewing spot.
 
I think their logic is that we cant prove that they are all Starlink or satellites, or that they don't all show up on their tracking apps, therefore they could possibly potentially still be NHI that have been telepathically summoned.

I think that's a bit of a stretch.
Isn't this kind of faulty thinking at the heart of recent UFOology: it's not impossible an unidentified object is NHI, therefore the probability it is NHI is 50%.
 
Isn't this kind of faulty thinking at the heart of recent UFOology: it's not impossible an unidentified object is NHI, therefore the probability it is NHI is 50%.

This, and the thought that science only makes advances when it proposes things that have not been considered or discovered before, so we should always consider the existence and presence of NHI or aliens.

The common analogy is that people didn't know that germs and cells were causing illness and disease because the scientists at the time were unable to see them until the invention of the microscope. They try to compare this to the 'UAP phenomenon', but the analogy fails because people are able to see UAPs everywhere, even with the naked eye, but when we use instruments and to zoom in on them it becomes apparent that they are balloons, birds, planes, satellites and celestial objects.
 
Last edited:
So what's to stop someone from going to the same spot, shooting video of the same things, and pointing out that no "psionics" were involved?
 
So what's to stop someone from going to the same spot, shooting video of the same things, and pointing out that no "psionics" were involved?
For that to be effective, you'd have to duplicate exactly the thing they were claiming was anomalous. If you simply go there and record some Starlink satellites, they can still claim that what they saw was different from what you recorded, because they saw it with the naked eye, and they know what they saw (even if they didn't get great video).

So you'd be replicating a vague claim, which really isn't something you can do.
 
For that to be effective, you'd have to duplicate exactly the thing they were claiming was anomalous. If you simply go there and record some Starlink satellites, they can still claim that what they saw was different from what you recorded, because they saw it with the naked eye, and they know what they saw (even if they didn't get great video).

So you'd be replicating a vague claim, which really isn't something you can do.
It demonstrates how vague the claim is, though.
 
For that to be effective, you'd have to duplicate exactly the thing they were claiming was anomalous. If you simply go there and record some Starlink satellites, they can still claim that what they saw was different from what you recorded, because they saw it with the naked eye, and they know what they saw (even if they didn't get great video).

So you'd be replicating a vague claim, which really isn't something you can do.
Which is why you need to have multiple viewing points miles apart so that multiple simultaneous recordings can be made.
Triangulation would reveal if the orbs were nearby or more likely all in orbit.
But these folks will never allow such a thing to happen, concealing the location where their single point observations will be made until the day of the 'viewing'.

Bottom line is it would be easy for them to prove the existence of these orbs if they wanted to, with multiple viewing locations surrounding the area where they will appear recording their location and movements from different directions. Don't expect this to ever happen. They will claim that the presence of these other sites will scare away the aliens, or that the aliens will detect the presence of skeptics and not show up, or something like that.
 
Let's try to minimize the mocking, please.

One problem in topics like this is that they are often a mixture of true (misguided) belief, genuine inquiry, exaggeration, showmanship, and fraud.

The precise quantities are unknown.

We can look at videos like this and see that there's nothing clearly anomalous (and often we can point to what it actually is). But we also see a lot of people who think these summonings are genuine.

While those people are almost certainly wrong, it does not help to mock them. And where we can't determine exactly where people are on the believer-to-charlatan scale, it's best to be charitable in our assumptions.
 
Back
Top