steve holmes
Member
this article is a joke. I take photos of sky trails every day as I ride my bike 2-4 hours not too far from where this data was taken. Yesterday between 12:30 and 4:45 I saw 42 trails. Today (Oct 6th) I saw 38.
It's NOT the number of trails that is important, though it seems you're trying to debunk chemtrails by talking about how many contrails there are. The difference between yesterday and today is that the TRAILS LASTED LONGER. They persisted longer and thus looked longer. There were even a few that seemed to be chemtrails but they were just real long contrails.
Trails last longer when the air is more moist (as you say). That was real obvious since there cirrus clouds covering the sky. Seeing more persistent contrails does NOT negate that chemtrails exist!!!!!!!!! (and I saw a few between 6:00 pm and 7:00 pm yesterday)
It's NOT the number of trails that is important, though it seems you're trying to debunk chemtrails by talking about how many contrails there are. The difference between yesterday and today is that the TRAILS LASTED LONGER. They persisted longer and thus looked longer. There were even a few that seemed to be chemtrails but they were just real long contrails.
Trails last longer when the air is more moist (as you say). That was real obvious since there cirrus clouds covering the sky. Seeing more persistent contrails does NOT negate that chemtrails exist!!!!!!!!! (and I saw a few between 6:00 pm and 7:00 pm yesterday)
Last edited by a moderator: