He was making some distinction about the part of the world where trails were seen? Any idea why?
Possibly related to his idea that all WWII contrails were due to water injection? Maybe he thinks different planes were used in the Pacific?
He was making some distinction about the part of the world where trails were seen? Any idea why?
Possibly related to his idea that all WWII contrails were due to water injection? Maybe he thinks different planes were used in the Pacific?
sweet. was that on facebook, cause I'm not finding it in browser search.Of course it wasn't the Fascist NWO who terminated his channel, it was because he is a thief.
sweet. was that on facebook, cause I'm not finding it in browser search.
Damn, and all this time I thought YouTube was exposing "the fascist NWO!"They look at it as a badge of honor, they feel the more times they are taken down, the closer they are to the truth, they won't mention the copyright infringements that led to the take down. Max already has a new channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkVwJARa97zzXchnhyY8lwA
His facebook reaction:
View attachment 9849
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...0810995396.524896.685100395&type=1&permPage=1
Bliss on Wigington.
Now both may start claiming that the other is a government operative that is trying to "divide and conquer". This type of infighting is why the CT movements never get any traction (thankfully).There is a large schism in what they believe. Wigington says that Global Warming is caused by chemtrails... Bliss says that Global warming is a hoax. They have clashed about this before.
True. That, and the whole lack of any compelling evidence whatsoever. But I'm nitpicking.Now both may start claiming that the other is a government operative that is trying to "divide and conquer". This type of infighting is why the CT movements never get any traction (thankfully).
Not quite. Dane fully accepts AGW is valid, but believes that chemtrails/geoengineering has been deployed to mitigate the effects, but that it is being over done, or that there are further unintended effects.There is a large schism in what they believe. Wigington says that Global Warming is caused by chemtrails... Bliss says that Global warming is a hoax. They have clashed about this before.
Max has stumbled upon the ACCESS missions.
View attachment 10631
View attachment 10632
https://www.facebook.com/mrmaxbliss/posts/10152892441205396?pnref=story
Max when will you ever learn? Ignorance really is Bliss!
I assume that Max's mocking answer is actually the correct one.
Also I would think that the air would be warmer right behind the DC-8, which would mean that the air is not conducive for forming contrails.plus also the smaller jet on the left is very close to the edge of the frame. Is it possible there ARE contrails but just forming that little bit further away? What distance behind that jet SHOULD a contrail form?
Note at 8:25 the low-bypass Snecma M53's of the Mirage 2000 at that specific time not producing contrails while the Airbus A340s hi-bypass are still producing.
'cause some CT they believed said it--probably when they were first getting indoctrinated--Yep, but the current prevailing "wisdom" in chemmie circles is that high-bypass engines CAN'T produce contrails. Ask them why they believe...
Why would switching to bio-jet-fuel stop contrails?"
Contrails, Geoengineering, and the Single Fuel Concept
http://climateviewer.com/2014/11/05/contrails-geoengineering-single-fuel-concept/
Jim, can you answer this question please?
How do you reconcile the requirement for Geoengineering to be carried out in the high Stratosphere, with the total inability of any current aircraft, and particularly the airliners usually filmed by chemtrail advocates, to get anywhere near the required altitudes, even without a useful load much less with one?
And while you are mulling that one, can you also explain how, if Geoengineering additives are in the fuel, why we never see white trails on takeoff, climb and descent?
After you have ignored that question, can you also explain how geoengineering nanoparticles can be added to commercially available fuel without altering the specific Gravity of the fuel, something that pilots such as myself are required to check after every refuelling.
Please then explain how said nanoparticles can be added without affecting the freezing temperature of the fuel, something that is also required to be known to the degree by both pilots and onboard fuel temperature sensing systems?
In your own time please...
@rezn8d ("Jim Lee") --- you posted a video that is over 45 minutes long with no specific time references and claims.
When I have the time I will attempt to address that video, and post in its "comments" section as to (what I expect I will find) its many errors.
But first, could you help out by citing one or two actual points from the video? (I presume you've already watched it in its entirety?).
Why would switching to bio-jet-fuel stop contrails?
What does JP-4 have to do with the fantasy of chemtrails? JP-4 was used because it does not freeze up like other jet fuels. When we flew with JP-5 at high altitude our fuel control unit would freeze up and as we descended our engine would go sub idle, stuck, essentially off. How does switching fuels support the "chemtrail" fantasy and claims of conspiracy? When aircraft crash, the fuel can burn; even JetA burns and can blow up in flight. Why bring up flash point and leave out defined claims.
There are additives in our car gasoline - is that part of the chemtrail conspiracy never explained with facts.