@Joe there's an existing thread on the hearing:
https://www.metabunk.org/airliner-emissions-epa-hearing.t6367/
https://www.metabunk.org/airliner-emissions-epa-hearing.t6367/
So how about a short educational video on every flight. We may not need to address the issue with the believers directly, but as long as when someone hears them talking about 'chemtrails', they are told, "there was a short film on the flight we just went on, etc". Especially when it comes from a family member that they trust. The film doesn't have to be 'dis-info', just as long as it explains some basics about flight, including contrails and what they are.
I think that's pretty good. Of course, it's not for the hard-core believers. But people who have not yet been exposed to the chemtrail theory will be less likely to believe it if they encounter it later.
Thanks Dan, and welcome to Metabunk!I am a new member, worked as a Flight Service Specialist from 1979 to 2006, got my Private Pilot License in 1983 and bought a Piper Cherokee in 1986 which I flew all over the country accumulating 550 hours Pilot in Command. I'm retired now and no longer have the plane but still follow aviation and weather. As an FSS I was trained extensively in weather as we were required to do weather observations and also deliver weather briefings to all types of pilots from private to ATP. I know that persistent contrails are NORMAL and why. It sickens me to see this chemtrail hoax being foisted on the public causing undue alarm. I've been posting tweets on some of the chemtrail sites but they don't want to listen to reason, calling me a troll and a shill and trying to ban me. I would really like to help fight the disinformation about persistant contrails being "chemtrails".
Mick, you have done a tremendous job here with this site, keep up the good work!
Dan Page
I respectfully disagree. In my opinion it's a worthwhile cause, and as long as you don't expect instant success and keep a certain emotional distance, it does not intrude too much.Do something better with your retirement, Dan.
Yes, it has been done. Here, for example, is how the contrail sampling was done by NASA in 2013:I read a post from 2 or 3 years ago that somebody was offering $10,000 I think it was, to have an aircraft follow behind another aircraft that was producing a persistent contrail, and sample the chemical components so as to gather proof that persistent contrails were just water vapor. Just wondering now, was that experiment ever done? If not, is there still some person (s) wanting/willing to do this? I realize that it could be difficult to find the right met conditions AND get FAA permission in the short time frame required (met condx constantly changing). Probably the best hope for success would be with military aircraft, as they are allowed to fly in formation. Anyway, just curious if this has been done.
Dan
You can download a PDF of their presentation on this experiment by clicking the following link:External Quote:
The modified HU-25 Falcon probes the exhaust contrails from NASA's DC-8 flying laboratory as both aircraft enter a turn at about 35,000 feet altitude during the first data-collection flight in restricted test airspace over California's high desert.
Credits: NASA/Lori Losey
This Linda Howe?Linda Howe is a frequent guest on the show and she is one of the few quests that really tries to get to the truth, perhaps I will try to contact her and see if she is willing to pursue this story.
She also has her own entry in Rationalwiki which often doesn't bode well for ones credibility:External Quote:Linda Moulton Howe (born January 20, 1944) is an American investigative journalist and documentarian. She is best known as a ufologist and advocate of a variety of conspiracy theories. She is well known for her investigations of cattle mutilations, and her conclusion that they are of extraterrestrial origin. She is also noted for her speculations that the U.S. government is involved with aliens
but then folks do say it takes a thief to catch a thief.External Quote: