eon_flux
New Member
I used to believe in 'chemtrails'. I even had a website (skymod.org) - now dormant. I left 'the movement' after finally finding sensibility - only after asking myself and other people in 'the movement' some pertinent questions. Of course, no-one could answer these questions, but what I found, was that by being on 'the dark side' and having communications, meant I was able to mildly influence a few people. A couple of website owners agreed that they had got caught up in the hype associated with CTs and could not substantiate some of the claims, and from what I could see, some content was changed.
The questions I asked were primarily about logistics: where are the planes flying from; where and when are the chemicals transferred to the plane; where are the chemicals stored (on the ground); how and when are the chemicals being transported to the ground bases; etc. I asked people to help build the ultimate guide to chemtrails. The questions remained un-answered on my website for some months, my mailbox wasn't exactly filling up. In some conversations I pointed out to people that a paper discussing a principle wasn't the same as proof of it happening. Surprisingly although I had been in touch with such names as Scott Stevens and Dane Wigington, they also never replied to my questions or any further emails. I also sent an email at about the same time to many of the people I knew, disputing claims that DW had made that the high bypass engine should cause LESS trails, not more.
I think the mindset should be explained in greater depth than, paranoid, un-trusting and of course the reliance on the belief of anything that was posted in favour of the theory was taken as proof. But as some of the last posts on my website claimed (from memory) was that the issue was so divided because it was those that believed, and those that didn't. There wasn't and as far as I can tell, still isn't a true middle ground. Someone seemingly being 'on both sides'. There was one individual that attempted to put me on the right track by explaining not just science about contrails but also about weather patterns, and humidity patches, etc. It was the fact that this person quietly and calmly contacted me personally to talk to me, that finally saw me start to reason and question both sides. Speaking as someone who deals with technology and electricity on a daily basis, I now see my beliefs as being somewhat silly.
Whilst the folks on here do a great job at calmly insisting on the scientific principles, it is the big vacuum/cavern/valley between the two views that causes a mistrust of science or rational thought. Unfortunately many disbeliever comments on youtube are overly critical of believers and this just causes more problems. There needs to be some kind of active scientific TRUTH movement outside the realms of sites like this that attempts to equally oppose the other view.
The questions I asked were primarily about logistics: where are the planes flying from; where and when are the chemicals transferred to the plane; where are the chemicals stored (on the ground); how and when are the chemicals being transported to the ground bases; etc. I asked people to help build the ultimate guide to chemtrails. The questions remained un-answered on my website for some months, my mailbox wasn't exactly filling up. In some conversations I pointed out to people that a paper discussing a principle wasn't the same as proof of it happening. Surprisingly although I had been in touch with such names as Scott Stevens and Dane Wigington, they also never replied to my questions or any further emails. I also sent an email at about the same time to many of the people I knew, disputing claims that DW had made that the high bypass engine should cause LESS trails, not more.
I think the mindset should be explained in greater depth than, paranoid, un-trusting and of course the reliance on the belief of anything that was posted in favour of the theory was taken as proof. But as some of the last posts on my website claimed (from memory) was that the issue was so divided because it was those that believed, and those that didn't. There wasn't and as far as I can tell, still isn't a true middle ground. Someone seemingly being 'on both sides'. There was one individual that attempted to put me on the right track by explaining not just science about contrails but also about weather patterns, and humidity patches, etc. It was the fact that this person quietly and calmly contacted me personally to talk to me, that finally saw me start to reason and question both sides. Speaking as someone who deals with technology and electricity on a daily basis, I now see my beliefs as being somewhat silly.
Whilst the folks on here do a great job at calmly insisting on the scientific principles, it is the big vacuum/cavern/valley between the two views that causes a mistrust of science or rational thought. Unfortunately many disbeliever comments on youtube are overly critical of believers and this just causes more problems. There needs to be some kind of active scientific TRUTH movement outside the realms of sites like this that attempts to equally oppose the other view.