Like I say, I really don't understand what you're getting at here. You want me to grant that, from my understanding of the evidence for and against, there's a literally zero probability that the WTC was demolished? I would say that, in so far as I understand these things at all, it's significantly more likely that the WTC was demolished than that the Earth is flat.I guess here's a slight chance that the earth is flat even though there is not one shred of evidence for it and all kinds of evidence against it right?
And the important thing here, of course, is that I can imagine a perfectly intelligent and educated person seriously considering the demolition theory for a while, while I think flat earthers are living figuratively (if perhaps happily) on, well, another planet. I don't know how to talk to them about geology, geography, gravity, etc. Truthers, however, I can talk to. (Not all of them, of course!)
I completely understand if you're different like that.